Right. The other, like 5 or something, background checks weren’t good enough to the left.

Don’t give them any ground in a debate. This final investigation was specifically to vet fords claim. That renders the whole job interview point moot.

I can give some ground that it is a job interview, because it partly is. Where they are wrong, is that its merely that, as accusations of crimes or criminal behavior bring legal recourse.

Ok. I’d definitely make the point that his logic invalidates Hillary from the presidency.

I’m saying the investigation renders the point moot because it pretty much was a trial.

I don't know much about this person, so i don't know if he is a "Devil lady" woops i mean Hillary guy.

If he’s a Hillary supporter it makes the inconsistency in his logic stand out.

I don't really need to even go there, if he does not care about how are system works (or is meant to work).
That's the only problem i need to talk about.

Ok.

anyone watch Justicar? (he makes less videos now, but talked about this).

No. I don’t know who that is

Not many people who know him, want to be on the wrong side of what Justicar is talking about.... heh

@Shadows that’s pretty cryptic.

What is, i just mean if you are on the other side of an argument he is making, which he chooses to speak about. There is a very good chance you are wrong.

@Salacious Swanky Cat the ironic thing is that the FBI “investigation” amounted to less than what the JC hearing was, since it was literally nothing more than a background check

FBI didn’t have subpoena power in that instance; JC did

If people really wanted to get those therapy notes out, Booker et. al would have subpoenaed the WaPo and/or Ford’s therapist for them

Just as an example

Since they were persistent that the notes and polygraph were “corroboration” as it were

Sweet Jesus

Ben Shapiro’s reaction to Lieawatha’s DNA test just made my day

Oh no, I am exiled to Twitter gulag for saying the thought crime.

<@375462051939876876> which one mate?

Far too many to even list now, need to be specific har har

@Deleted User we all know that the dems don’t want the truth.

I called someone a fucking retard for claiming that Ford accused Kavanaugh of attempted rape after I'd already pointed out to that very same person that what he was actually accused of was a misdemeanor.

Apparently someone reported me for it, because now I can't reply for a week.

I personally want to create a Twitter account with the sole intention of getting banned for life. Lol

What you haven't had that happen to you yet?

I’ve never had a Twitter...

its a great way to keep up on news

Fair enough, considering these days most “journalists” just go on Twitter for their scoops...

thats were you can hear stories....rumors first and its a little less rage inducing to keep up what the "other side" however you want to define that is talking about or stories they are following.....Its wrong to just dismiss then since they will report and follow stories others won't

Fair enough mate

... Probably still won’t get one

not for everyone. If you want to stay on you have to hold your tweets

I made the account for a programming assignment in school, and then decided to start using it for grins.

I'm always up for grins!

I have a twitter

that is at ed's blog twitter, with a 1 in place of the i

anyone here a Faith Goldy fan? Here is what's going on in Toronto. The Quiggin Report #39 - Political Campaigns About Nothing
https://soundcloud.com/quigginreport/quiggin-report-39-political-campaigns-about-nothing