@Deleted User there is a lot of uranium in Australia

I haven’t seen any of these apart from Total Recall but ...

@Deleted User comedy

@Salacious Swanky Cat pisses me off, instead of developing our nuclear capabilities we’re just selling that shit off willy-billy

Nilly*

nah, the watermelon party will never allow us to have nuclear power plants

the greens + labor

@Deleted User Australia has an amazing solar resource too. Both would be great.

@Agent Smith I cant stand the environmental groups. They lie about other things that are fine too.

@Agent Smith you in STRAYA as well?

producing solar panels makes more toxic waste than nuclear power plants

yup

Where at mate

Melb

Haha

_Haha_

Glad to see someone else suffering in the People’s Republic of Victoria

@Agent Smith id have to look at the data for that, but both are objectively better than coal.

at least it's not adelaide or perth

Adelaide everyone forgets about though so it doesn’t really count

if google takes your donation to a creator and send it to a "charity".... do they have to legally let you know so you can write if off on your own taxes?.. cause you know they will

I don't believe there is an active law on the books - which is a problem if that's their policy from a consumer's perspective - but it would not be unreasonable to pursue class-action litigation if that were the case.

There has to be some kind of law about giving money to one person, instead giving it to another person

Imagine leaving a tip for a waiter, but the restaurant owner didn't like your conversation during the meal, so he gives your money to someone else

There's no law on the books for that in that scenario. At least not a publicly acknowledged one in most states

Maybe I'll speak with a lawyer to find out whether or not a class-action suit is justified or not. It might be a tough sell considering I don't know if I've personally had my money redirected and it would carry more sway if it came from a content creator than a donor

That and it is Youtube we're talking about

The law is called "theft"

I'm reasonably sure that there is enough gray area for what superchats even are in the eyes of the law that YouTube can get away with it.

Which is why everyone that streams on YouTube should turn off superchats and use something else instead.

People giving money on YT's superchat are rather dumb anyway - At least, if they're expressing any kind of nonmainstream opinion

Google is literally attempting to control everything you think and say, giving them money is literally working against your own interest

Google probably keeps their share of the donated to charity redirected super chat, because they are low down money grubbers

Did tucker spank cenk in the debate?

Probably. I gotta watch.

Lot of lefties in the comment section saying tucker just agreed with cenk and made no points.

I want Matt to see my tranny boobs

😭

He would probably be confused.

I'm okay with confused attraction

Lol. I can still sort of tell even if a person is a passable tranny. Something just looks off. I could tell that something didn’t look quite what you would normally expect from girl with Blair white.