Message from @Dostayer
Discord ID: 544919115610062885
So this highlights my concern (or maybe curiosity) about this issue.
Is how we categorize mental disorders, diseases, abnormalities, etc. socially determined and defined or scientifically?
or are those two categorizations not mutually exclusive?
A lot of basic human traits have been incorrectly made pathological
i.e. California no longer mandating divulging your HIV to a sexual partner (if I'm referencing that properly) in order to reduce the stigma associated with having HIV...
I don't think they are mutually exclusive
HIV is a horrible virus
In relation to extra hand-webbing: I'd say that when something impedes normal functions is the line you could draw. If they don't negatively impact your manual dexterity it's nothing to worry about. But if they do, it's something to be concerned of.
Though perhaps by this same logic, since homosexuality doesn't produce offspring and is therefore a dead end, it would be classified as a disorder of some sort.
Promiscuity is pathological.
Does California's updated legislation suggest it's not "horrible", @Dostayer ?
It's stupid not to inform your partner, especially when PReP is so common
Promiscuity is gross and ends to be destroyed
Yes. Promiscuity destroys
No use defending it.
HIV will destroy your health and kill you, being gay won't
it isnt just stupid @Dostayer it is immoral.
Many gays has this phase, but they grow out of it.
The problem starts when they don't
I don’t think so.
Monogamy in gays is uncommon
I'm monogamous
Me too
how many of ya'll are gay?
I never said it didn’t happen
Just the two of them.
We both waited til marriage to do anything more than kiss. Im
Spanish and Dost?
Yes
Yep
sup, homos. 😃
They aren't as profilic
Being gay do not make you promiscuous
profilic...
Testosterone does
I need to look that up
that is awesome commitment to personal values btw @SpanishAbbey
got it
Thanks! It was very worth it <3
(y)
👍