They do have shady histories

That's what you believe, not what we know.

True

Except the shady histories

That we seem to know

Jussie's story made no sense to begin with. Two guys jump him and he fights them, but barely gets bruised, doesn't even lose his Subway sandwich, while somehow they manage to get a clothesline 'noose' around his neck before running off yelling 'this MAGA country Bitch!'

That is just not a plausible account of a beating

😮

Many cops are bad, but also many cops get So many accusations on them that are false or unproven, its hard to look at a cops history and know which is which.

And then he doesn't even take the 'noose' off but waits with it dangling on his neck for 45 minutes until the detectives arrive

NOT REAL

that is not how humans behave

What if the white guys that did it him we're the detectives investigating the case????

Maybe he was traumatized?

Why do you need to invent an elaborate theory to protect his honor?

Is it elaborate?

Anymore than the elaborate hoax Jussie was supposed to have committed?

We could all be here playing the What If game till the cow farts kill us.

Lol

#GreenNewDeal

@Shadows to be fair that is like, 12 years away tops

heh

TIPPY TOPS

Tails, if we are impugning the backgrounds of characters instead of going by the evidence in the Smollet case, that article was written by an intersectional feminist.

So it's invalid.

But, if the police force did abuse this event, that will most likely also be looked at and at some point we "might" know either way.

(this side of the story does not seem likely tho)

@uncephalized I would have gone with a BlackLivesMatter writer, but they are both as bad so it works lol.

Let's also not forget the fact that even the DA's office that dropped the charges have stated the evidence was sufficient to prove him guilty.

Or at least some higher up at the office have.

That's because the police preemptively poisoned the public's perception of the case by constantly commenting on it before it even went to court.
Apparently police don't normally talk about an ongoing investigation.
They did constantly here.
Isn't that suspicious?
Why didn't they follow the norm and wait to comment until after the trial?

Probably because Jussie was talking about it VERY LOUDLY himself

Even if he was
Does that mean the police should do the same?
Isn't that unethical if not illegal?

The police were very on his side at the beginning though

Listen... Right now the amount of circumstancial and hard evidence against Jussie greatly outweighs the amount of evidence going in his favor.

You're free to distrust the police all you like, but when you have left wing personalities admitting that someone from their tribe done goofed, they probably done goofed.

Sure, I'm not arguing that CPD is a bunch of standup guys

But what he said ^

This still would be a conspiracy from the whole city government to silence someone who would be much less worth silencing than many others in the most elaborate, unlikely, and yet risky way

Yeah but the left wing personalities saying this are part of Chicago's corrupt system.
And if those shady investigators are the one perpetrating the hoax the top brass might be as Hoodwinked as the rest of us.
Tho given what happened with laquan MacDonald clearly ppl like Rahm Emmanuel are perfectly content supporting the police even when they are in the wrong especially for political convenience

The conspiracy doesn't have to go beyond the investigating officers but it could include the police chief and or the mayor without too much trouble.
Chicago PD is notorious for protecting their own.
But it wouldn't have to be the whole government.
It could just be a handful of ppl

I see we are still Mooing.