idk man, that damned garbage disposal snap

hardly cataclysmic

^

oh no my feet are wet....UGH~

Someone did press her on the 12 year thing, and she said you'd have to be as dumb as a sea sponge/cucumber to take her literally

Louisiana could use a bath anyway

"The temperature is going to rise half a degree over the course of a century, let me explain to you why that's apocalyptic."

hmmmm

brace yourselves people, it's going to be ....slightly warmer

@wolfman1911 If i were to be charitable, what i believes she would mean in a statement like that is. If we don't do something within the next 12 years that is drastic enough. We will have already passed a catastrophe point.

Which yes, is still a stupid thing to think.

the runaway greenhouse effect I guess

are we even anywhere close to that?

imo the climate scientists from the UN have lost all credibility to me after the scandal of them cooking the models

@Lord Zedd No

the biggest threat of it is the methane stored in the ice

Probably, but the problem is that people have been claiming these points of no return for the last fifty years or so.

true

and we cant get any real debate going either

and even the methane isn't even unsolvable

its belive the worst case scenario of these models or else youre a denier

like mfer how are we going to figure out some decent solutions if youre a doomsayer

yeah and if a small country like Belgium doesn't use the right lightbulbs it's all over

just ignore India and China

I just think that the idea that we know enough of the variables involved in what makes the climate work to accurately model it centuries out is utterly absurd.

as bad as China is, even they have been taking steps on their own to solve their pollution

theres def a lot of assumptions in it, some variables are held constant, when they arent actually and vice versa

just the earth rotation alone is crazy complex

there's cycles within cycles

cycleception

it assumes their models are correct, but I don't think a single one has even gotten close to being correct

if anything nature seems to do the opposite

i think part of the problem is that its an academic bubble

and all that assumes that it is a necessarily bad for everythign

other sciences dont have that serious of a bubble

some animals and plants would come out ahead, nature's funny that way

^

even with that big mass of plastic in the ocean the Jellyfish are thriving

which means anything that eats Jellyfish will also thrive

isnt that plastic from other countries like china?

and anything that eats them