Message from @[DGI]tech
Discord ID: 607010166042263562
If that "accusation" is at all relevant to the accuser, there's not much point in continuing on.
the proper response is to walk away, the debate has just entered the idiotic zone
I know. But I am a sucker for arguing.
And we started argueing on socialism. Then got to merit. Then got to genetics. Then got to race.
Because of course she wanted to talk about race.
men are faster than women, nothing to argue about there. men always win the race
I did go that route.
Then she said that sounded like what the Nazis did.
https://tenor.com/w83m.gif
I bet each one of them are Democrats.....
that GIF is gross, it makes me shiver
The most offensive thing about that stone Toss exchange is the fact that those people somehow think they are better than him or are serving the interest of the millions dead in the Holocaust by trying to police his words and actions.
Not to get too macabre, but if you were to ask the opinion of the people in the death camps what they thought of someone making jokes at their expense 70 years later, I doubt they would care half as much as these ass clowns.
Also, just so we are clear, was the debate question that was "something something Donald Trump's bigotry?" Was that a real question?
Watching a debate between those clowns a full 400+ days before the election is to take place is the definition of 'useless distraction'.
Isn't there SOMETHING more pressing to be discussing?
Are you asking if it actually happened or if it's a legitimate question?
If it actually happened
I'm fully willing to believe that it was a cleverly edited sound bite by the right wing death squads.
Jesus Christ, it's even worse than I thought.
That's rude.
You should light them on fire instead.
<:kek:604393935007121426>
I'll second that vote!
Light them on fire!
Even if the accusation was true, imagine being the kind of asshole that would prefer people be poor than the idea that the president doesn't like the groups you like
The moment someone tries to ad hominem you with "white cis Christian male" in a debate they've already lost.
Hard to imagine the head-space these people live in. Think my head would explode with such cognitive dissonance.
Which would constitute a fair percentage of America.
EzWin
Hey, anyone else notice how many of the Dem canidates are cross-eyed?
Like Mr. Booker?
Not so sure that is true @[DGI]tech
If a debate is about convincing the third-party observers, then that tactic WILL inevitable win over those observers who follow their heart more than their head.
The collectivist group think may think they've won, but they're wrong inherently.
So?
Since when does being 'right' win the debate, especially if the judges are bias?
Light the judges on fire.
Agreed. Fire it is
Woo!