He only gets 2 terms

So he will leave eventually

Leaving is for quitters

Executive order suspend judiciary, congress and the senate.

Retirement on top is for winners

This is MAGA PLANET!

I wonder if the union will survive until 2024 if he gets reelected

If it doesn't, I guess he really never will "leave" office

Yup, @C1PHER , I work with union morons

Oh. That Union. Nvm

Idk did Louis XVI leave office?

Well, he did lose his head I believe

He was physically removed, so to speak

the "Head" of the state lol

Hoax hate crime at my friends work. Black guy wrote fuck you nigger trump2020 all over some paper with some swastikas and put it in one of the work vehicles

After two weeks the guy finally came forward and confessed he did it

Wonder what compelled him to confess.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1296

"The prohibition does not apply to a firearm that is (1) manually operated by bolt, pump, lever, or slide action; (2) permanently inoperable; (3) an antique; or **(4) a rifle or shotgun specifically identified by make and model**."

what the fuck does that mean

that sounds like literally every rifle and shotgun

wtf

wait it means specified by the bill

nvm

I assume that last point means there will be a white list to let the crones keep selling.

but still:

<a:aBOI:432877422459879424>

what is the opinion here on the arms trade act being dropped?

Hey guys, help me out: Has there ever been a single long-term (5+ years) climate prediction that's come true?

If your definition is loose enough.

If there was, I'm sure we all would have heard about it by now

"Tides every 12 hours or so" has a pretty good track record for example.

That's the thing. People cite recent stories of droughts or fires, trying to retroactively prove long-term climate predictions with individual weather events.

It's easy to take post scriptive data and read it as prescriptive. Buts it's not a guarantee

I mentioned there hasn't been a single prediction come true in 50 years, and ten different people attacked me for it. No one believes me anyway, but I've REALLY looked. I can't find one.

"blah blah doesn't matter if the scientists are wrong we need to do something what are you saying that we should do nothing at all?"

People always day "absence of evidence is not evidence for absence " buuuutttt

It's insane. People wouldn't bet you their weekly paycheck on what the weather will be next week, but they want to bet trillions of dollars on the fact that they know what it'll be 50 years from now

Just do what you can in your power to reduce your personal carbon footprints

And then let them think what they want

@GoGoGadgetWang1 I mentioned that. Uncertainty in probabilities stack, and the best we can go on is historical precedent. But they claim I don't know the difference between weather and climate, which is precisely the fallacy they use to "prove" their side.