Message from @codrod
Discord ID: 646773286616694794
False
True
Germany had no gold.
LOL
It does however lead that all forms of socialism thus far tried have lead to complete economic ruin
It was, however, commodity based, which is analogous
They tied the value of their currency to the market price of Gold
We need a fake and gay reaction
That's what "Gold Standard" means
And you fags call me a lefty
That's a cold dead take
literally advocating socialism
🤮
Peak jewry to organize political thought on the flow of shekels.
Also, the word privatize was coined in reference to the NSDAP's economic policies.
I mean you need shekels to eat
You need labor to eat.
I'm a third positionist, not a "muh socialist".
so yeah bottom line not having to consume my fellow humans for sustenance is pretty much my political priority
What is what
The gold standard is a specific commodity backed money.
Broad commodity based trade policy allows a nation to sidestep international restrictions on the movement of gold.
So?
It's barter on an international scale.
I'm talking about an historic fact here
It's different. The money wasn't good backed, or redeemable in gold.
Germany pinned their mark to Gold
to combat hyperinflation
Not really.
Technically what they did was invent a parallel currency.
Yeah that's not the gold standard in the same sense as the old US gold standard.
So you say you're not advocating socialism, but you're advocating "nationalist socialism". Functionally, if you're seizing private property and nationalizing industry, what is the difference? How is this a third point of view?
because it's not dogmatic
The price was pinned to gold, it just wasn't redeemable for Gold.
Is "we take that which the minorities have and nationalize it" not a dogma?
NatSocs have no idealogical committment to ether, rather they will use whichever seems to suit the current situation
in this way Hitler seized some businesses, and did not seize many others
The dogma of the NatSoc seems to be 'that which benefits the Volk is good'
that