So is the standard that anything salacious is not art, therefore not protected speech, @Sugar Free ?

free speech exists to protect the profane

Or the movie ‘antichrist’ has full penetration

It's too late to 'slow down' immigration.

@Lord Zedd
Nope.

I say we should open borders

I want to test out some catapults

No, because there's a difference between a scupler of the human body and pornography

Freedom of speech was written to protect political speech, never smut or anything of the kind

You mentioned pin up girls though.

Who makes that call?

Who defines what's smut?

what ever you jerk it to becomes porn

Once smut is banned, printing smut becomes civil disobedience.

Yeah, to be ironically dumb

Even if freedom of speech was not intended to protect porn, I don't how porn laws can be enforced without violating it.

The anime avatar is lecturing you on the evils of porno

Porn shouldn't be banned. That'll cause a lot of issues. But to say porn is protected by free speech, hell no

Spader's just doing some authoritarian moralizing. Lol

add to that the poor track record prohibition has

@MechMage
The way they were for the vast majority of our history.

No they weren't

He probably just got done wanking to some step sister porn

@JetPuffed yeah how dare people legislate morality

No one ever accused the government of following the constitution.

it's protected as motion pictures,

Sexualized images and stories have existed since the beginning of time

America is named after a pornographer

Little sister lolis are great

^lol oh boy

It wouldn't be a porn ban, it would be an obscenity ban

@MechMage
Lolwut. The people who signed the Constitution passed obscenity laws.

So who decides what's obscene?

Spader does.

Is violence obscene?

Glad we can talk about important things like impeachment that will be meaningless in two years

Bad language?

Now he's evading.

@JetPuffed there's no need to project so hard

The idea that you know more about the Constitution than people like James Madison is insane.