Message from @sydtko

Discord ID: 653741824778829846


2019-12-09 23:22:59 UTC  

@Lenore ❤️

2019-12-09 23:23:03 UTC  

❤️

2019-12-09 23:24:12 UTC  

Shut up Jon

2019-12-09 23:24:41 UTC  

ESP could be just be "senses outside of normative percepts" or some shit

2019-12-09 23:24:45 UTC  

But that naturalizes it

2019-12-09 23:25:05 UTC  

Like savants with savant syndrome able to do huge calculations normal people cannot

2019-12-09 23:25:14 UTC  

Would fall into a "sense outside of normativity"

2019-12-09 23:26:45 UTC  

Fucking modal semantics

2019-12-09 23:26:47 UTC  

it's time to stop

2019-12-09 23:27:08 UTC  

A concept is contingently true... why would someone say this

2019-12-09 23:27:21 UTC  

Mmmmmmm hyperintensional modal semantics

2019-12-09 23:27:37 UTC  

I'm getting all gooey

2019-12-09 23:34:12 UTC  

@Deleted User Type-F physicalism

2019-12-09 23:34:14 UTC  

Is still physicalism

2019-12-09 23:35:43 UTC  

@Deleted User Hempel's Dilemma

2019-12-09 23:35:50 UTC  

I accept a tautological definition of physical and natural

2019-12-09 23:35:56 UTC  

But reject dualism, because it's not parsimonious

2019-12-09 23:36:07 UTC  

You need not say there's some alternate substance called "the mental"

2019-12-09 23:36:27 UTC  

So... you just eliminate it and use that as a placeholder normatively... (because people have concepts of mental)

2019-12-09 23:36:36 UTC  

A la: people have mental illness (these are physical illness)

2019-12-09 23:37:38 UTC  

Abstracts are contingent on ... the subject or concept holder... unless you're talking about the referent of the abstracts

2019-12-09 23:38:44 UTC  

Impossible = still impossible in possible worlds

2019-12-10 00:04:05 UTC  

P1. Nothing comes from nothing
P2. There is something
C. There has always been something

2019-12-10 00:07:16 UTC  

It's merely aesthetic and the baggage Inspiring Philosophy talks about

2019-12-10 00:07:22 UTC  

They're alternate cosmological models

2019-12-10 00:07:30 UTC  

A - > B -> A

2019-12-10 00:07:39 UTC  

Singularity - > Universe as it is today - > singularity

2019-12-10 00:07:49 UTC  

The evidence points to expanding universe though, that's still not a problem though

2019-12-10 00:08:54 UTC  

1 sec someone's talking to me

2019-12-10 00:09:19 UTC  

the current evidence is the universe is still examnding, however, there are models of Crunch

2019-12-10 00:09:47 UTC  

There's also minor contradiction in the current model in the existence of supermassive blackholes that ought not be there

2019-12-10 00:10:50 UTC  

@AusFox Consensus is Big Freeze

2019-12-10 00:10:58 UTC  

You have a .00000000000000000000000001 / 7 bil theory

2019-12-10 00:11:08 UTC  

So you get your Big Dick Cosmo theory in the memes

2019-12-10 00:11:13 UTC  

👍