Message from @sydtko
Discord ID: 653741824778829846
@Lenore ❤️
❤️
Shut up Jon
ESP could be just be "senses outside of normative percepts" or some shit
But that naturalizes it
Like savants with savant syndrome able to do huge calculations normal people cannot
Would fall into a "sense outside of normativity"
Fucking modal semantics
it's time to stop
A concept is contingently true... why would someone say this
Mmmmmmm hyperintensional modal semantics
I'm getting all gooey
@Deleted User Type-F physicalism
Is still physicalism
@Deleted User Hempel's Dilemma
I accept a tautological definition of physical and natural
But reject dualism, because it's not parsimonious
You need not say there's some alternate substance called "the mental"
So... you just eliminate it and use that as a placeholder normatively... (because people have concepts of mental)
Abstracts are contingent on ... the subject or concept holder... unless you're talking about the referent of the abstracts
Impossible = still impossible in possible worlds
P1. Nothing comes from nothing
P2. There is something
C. There has always been something
It's merely aesthetic and the baggage Inspiring Philosophy talks about
They're alternate cosmological models
A - > B -> A
Singularity - > Universe as it is today - > singularity
The evidence points to expanding universe though, that's still not a problem though
1 sec someone's talking to me
the current evidence is the universe is still examnding, however, there are models of Crunch
There's also minor contradiction in the current model in the existence of supermassive blackholes that ought not be there
You have a .00000000000000000000000001 / 7 bil theory
So you get your Big Dick Cosmo theory in the memes
👍