@Leet lil buddy

That's it. Chapters 5 and 6 are what looked good to me

@sydtko https://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2022/8120/umi-indiana-2089.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

you may be interested

fuck is it?

Maybe

I'm reading some of the controversy surrounding it but

https://web.archive.org/web/20050310013515/http://www.ssc.uwo.ca/psychology/faculty/rushtonpdfs/Gould.pdf

"...overall correlation of .30 of brain size to intelligence..."

lmao

That paper is single author though. J. Phillipe Rushton... I'll check and see if he's credible (or been shit on by the community)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Philippe_Rushton

Meh. Psychology is pretty shit so... I'm just gonna hold out for more from neurology, neuropsychology, and empirics

There's a lot of bias in this controversy so it's basically awash

@sydtko its regarding goulds criticism of psychometrics its written by a philosopher of science

I'm aware of quite a lot of the critiques but meh

this is a novel contribution not making the same arguments

Yeah, I see that it is recent, but I dunno if/when I'll read the whole paper

@Patrick @L.A.IN https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaLib2WQhtk

@Deleted User 6a019ab66177 why are you posting people?

Nice debunked book @sydtko

@Marcdoof

@Deleted User Gizmo was talking about it so I looked it up... I wouldn't say it's all debunked but yeah, he did not put forward a holistic or honest analysis without bias. Gould cherry picked and no doubt in my mind Charles Murray cherry picked

I was memeing tbh

But if was responded to

So...... that leaves me back in the skeptical boat
I believe brain size most likely will have some impact on your potential g-factor...
And you can isolate that by legit chopping up people's brains, but I don't think it's one of the more important factors

It was, yes...

By murrady and what's his name

There was a recent study claiming glial cells and lots of genes were important as well to g factor

Charles Murray and Richard Lynn?

They're both ... very biased

And most moronic race realists ignore that ***rolled into the definition of hereditary is your childhood upbringing*** and heavy elements of your SES

So if you were at all honest about the memes underlying genetics... you'd want equivalent SES to see how distinctions arise (socialism)
Equivalent material conditions aside genetics

Have you read into this?

Quite a bit over a long while, yes

Hagar has found a home

This server is a place where she feels elevated

I've been interested in IQ since like ... 16 and I'm 31, so

And anyone actually having paid attention to it ought realize it's getting more and more complex with more discovery
Because epigenetics, optogenetics and neuropsychology are basically entirely new fields

Wait you're 31