Message from @Methode
Discord ID: 664238296142184469
@sydtko fuck i wasn't checking the tumeric index
yeah, that's a big mistake
I had a long running tin foil hat theory about afghanistan and lo and behold... it's vindicated in many ways
Opium production went up, Pharma memes of opioid crisis
So every time America does something, they do all kinds of shady economic shit
```The facts of an apparently non-significant resultant change to opium production is corroborated in a report by BBC, dated to 20 July 2015:[42]
Nine years of intense fighting by international troops did nothing to stop the production. In fact it only became worse. The only difference was that it has been pushed out beyond the central populated zone to less governed badlands beyond the Helmand canal. ```
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_production_in_Afghanistan
^ but this metric shows that Afghanistan has actually become more stable <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388>
You see?
@actual_communist_boi <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388>
@actual_communist_boi Whether the USA is a net destabilizing force in the middle east
Or net stabilizing
<:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388>
Escape hatch
BAIL OUT
EJECT
lmfao the philosophy neets can't argue anything but semantics
epic
e🅱️ic
1 may lead to 2
You don't get rid of 1
so... Iraq war might create isis? Yes?
I don't think anyone would dispute that
It's a particular that ... probably still is only orthogonal to "Net stabilize/destabilize"
If X and Y then A.
If X and not Y then not A.
If X, then A or not A.
A is bad.
X is bad or not bad.
<:MonkaS:643820797605183488>
IS this performative gaslighting?
it always is
It is possible that interventionism can create stabilization in the region
So an invasion can stabilize a region
hence why asking for a syllogism is bad, **unless** they were asking for an empirical syllogism
which is absurd, there's no reason they'd need a syllogism for this claim
i am disappoint
You can formalize empirics? ???????????
Is absurd ???? <:MonkaS:643820797605183488>
I can't tell where a troll
I hope he's trolling