yeah, that's a big mistake

I had a long running tin foil hat theory about afghanistan and lo and behold... it's vindicated in many ways

Opium production went up, Pharma memes of opioid crisis

So every time America does something, they do all kinds of shady economic shit

```The facts of an apparently non-significant resultant change to opium production is corroborated in a report by BBC, dated to 20 July 2015:[42]

Nine years of intense fighting by international troops did nothing to stop the production. In fact it only became worse. The only difference was that it has been pushed out beyond the central populated zone to less governed badlands beyond the Helmand canal. ```
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_production_in_Afghanistan

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5c/Afghanistan_opium_poppy_cultivation_1994-2007b.PNG/400px-Afghanistan_opium_poppy_cultivation_1994-2007b.PNG

^ but this metric shows that Afghanistan has actually become more stable <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388>

You see?

@actual_communist_boi <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388>

@actual_communist_boi Whether the USA is a net destabilizing force in the middle east

Or net stabilizing

<:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> <:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388>

Escape hatch

BAIL OUT

EJECT

lmfao the philosophy neets can't argue anything but semantics

epic

e🅱️ic

You can have 1 without having 2

1 may lead to 2

You don't get rid of 1

so... Iraq war might create isis? Yes?

I don't think anyone would dispute that

It's a particular that ... probably still is only orthogonal to "Net stabilize/destabilize"

If X and Y then A.
If X and not Y then not A.
If X, then A or not A.
A is bad.
X is bad or not bad.

@ilovemyself

<:MonkaS:643820797605183488>

IS this performative gaslighting?

it always is

It is possible that interventionism can create stabilization in the region

So an invasion can stabilize a region

hence why asking for a syllogism is bad, **unless** they were asking for an empirical syllogism

which is absurd, there's no reason they'd need a syllogism for this claim

i am disappoint

You can formalize empirics? ???????????

Is absurd ???? <:MonkaS:643820797605183488>

I can't tell where a troll

I hope he's trolling

Or this double down is ... dumb as fuck