non-note

It's funnier for Xiaomi flagships

great sensors, shit software

Dunno about that my redmi 3 is quite poor

software is fine, using cm12

default google one

ill check it out

open camera is goood

i dont dare update this past android 5.1 tho

ill stick to what works

Xiaomi ""flagships"" if you want to call them like that, all have way worse battery lives than the Redmi Note 3

4000 mAh on a 5.5" 1920 x 1080

there is no other phone with nice hardware, a screen smaller than 6" and a >= 4000 mAh battery

the redmi gives you 2 days on a single charge

also please tell me which phone with a 625 does 2 days in your opinion

@am http://www.gearbest.com/cell-phones/pp_632464.html Can you squeeze $120 out of him?

@Deleted User which has a 4100 mAh battery

Also I thought the Note 4 was Mediatek, did they do a revision?

No I'm saying it has a similar sized battery like the redmi note 3 pro and a similar lifetime on a charge

so that chip isn't much more efficient than the pro3 chip

it's still "just put a huge fuck battery inside"

is the camera actually better than on the Note 3 Pro?

the only galaxy with a 4000 mAh battery is the 6" A9

you won't find mainstream phones with a >=4000 mAh battery and a screen <6"

worst of all is HTC in terms of battery jewing, putting a 2200 mAh battery into the A9 lets it last less than a day on moderate usage

You can buy a mainstream phone without a contract if that's the only reason

neither are perfect

https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/gemini-pda-android-linux-keyboard-mobile-device-phone

the only point is the camera of high end mainstream phones

but this might just be

assuming it will ever be manufactured

But a redmeme and dedicated pro compact camera costs less than a flagship and works better in arguably every way

yes I took a look already occasonally

fujitsu cameras seem to make the most exceptionally good photos in terms of compact cameras

Sony makes their own sensors

Sony's marketing seems to go a lot on "fast autofocus"

reminder that nearly all battery manufacturers exaggerate capacity, and even the ones that don't never give an accurate number since it varies frmo cell to cell and how many charge cycles it's been through

Also wasn't sony mostly using Carl Zeiss lenses?

Yeah non flagship photography lenses is probably just Zeiss sticking their name on it for marketing reasons

doesnt sony make pretty great lenses it self

yes