what if they all do?

companies that pander to niche ideologies exist everywhere

then another will be created that doesn't.

Not everywhere.

whether they will be mainstream is another point

that's the beauty of free market capitalism.

There's no company I know of that publicy advocates for race realism.

then there seems to be a hole in the market.

goddamn damnation

you are seriously making a stupid argument.

i would suggest you use your own freedom to create a tech company that does and not give two shits about regressive left politics.

you could call it GigaWhite

haha gigawhite

that's great.

So lets replace this dragonkin with anything

lets say with socialism

(also politically with higher taxation ect)

lets say with gay rights

lets say with pedophilia

lets say with marxism

or postmodernism or anything.

And lets say that they win.

companies make sex dolls modeled to be children

They do.

despite social pressure

So at what point do you say "No, I don't care that the majority of people agree with this, we are going to force you to follow what I say"

When they reduce the age of consent to 13?

When they tax you at 50% and nationalize industries?

When they use public tax dollars to fund universities to radicalize people into socialist perspectives?

when international NGO's support and prop up direct action for migration, like literally renting boats to ferry "migrants" to your shores?

age of consent is arbitrary and if we wanted it to mean anything it should be based on average puberty cycles 🤔

I agree, so we should lower age of consent to 13 and if you disagree ur a bigot.

🤔

start making content again

At what point does someone's freedom run up against your freedom, or is that simply a matter of defining what it means to be "free" and what you'll take before you're personally pissed off enough to commit direct action?

Freedom is a stupid thing to make your ideology on, because it doesn't mean shit, it's defined by whoever's using it at the time, whiny little teenage cunts think it means they can grow up and be what they want, and it fundamentally undermines society and makes it impossible to eject hostile actors

what's your opinion on the Non aggression principle?

it's stupid.

few things about the use of force

a) it's apolitical

b) it's an expression of a fundamental human psychology