Message from @Emile Borovich
Discord ID: 486540111174041611
Yeah. My only point was that the liberalists making their own video when one does the job fine already just to avoid the potential association with a scary conservative is a dumb idea.
But feel free to get triggered as much as you want by it and lump me alongside the alt-right
Gentlemen theres no need to resort to ad hominems now
Personally i see valid points for both perspectives on this like the glorious centrist i am
While the liberalistd do support freedom of association by and large the general public do not
By making our own video we can aim to bring these ideas to the public without worry of the partisan connection getting in the way
Most people don't seem to support freedom of speech all that much either
Unfortunately
Thats because they dont see its value
They assune it wont be their speech thats censored
Part of freedom of association is choosing who you associate with. I don't hate all of Pragers ideas, but I *personally* don't want our brand to be publicly associated with him and Prager U.
I didn't associate you witht he alt-right, Joshua. I observed taht saying 'our whole thing' is freedom of association when it isn't directly stated in the principles is dangerous turf.
I don't want to give any ideologues the idea that they can simply point at Prager, then point at us and say we're just Tradcons larping as Liberals
Its not like he said it at a press brief
Oh alright then, then I guess I am not allowed to disagree.
Thanks for showing me the importance of freedom of speech.
You guys are right, I am wrong.
Im saying its a misunderstanding
We're all about freedom of association, 100%.
Nothing else matters.
Democracy? Nope. Can do without it.
It's our whole thing.
I read it as him saying its part of our beliefs
Na our whole thing is freedom of association.
Why r u like this
It's right there, first principle written out.
~~True actually fuck democracy~~ im not making a good case for myself here
lol
I mean the first principle is individual rights, does freedom of association not come under that?
If freedom of association is 'our whole thing' then why is the UK banning anyone from their page that is even vaguely identitarian?
If not, I'm happy to be corrected
what page sorry
facebook?
Or why is Jon Wong being labeled as sympathetic to the alt-right for hanging with GI?
facebook then
because facebook is gay and cancer
'Bullocks' on your FoA.
This argument seems like tone policing to me
Practice what you preach, pastor.
oh right i speak for all the UK i forgot