Message from @Clement_Down
Discord ID: 492187422004609028
how's solitude going? @KiwiMorgs
Omg your like so funny
I still like you kiwi
ok
What do you mean you have no social events planned?
shilling @ALPHA-OMEGA livestream
hot
Ooo
G'nite
nite nite
oi
what're we talking about?
you missed garry he left awhile ago
garry?
@Deleted User - glych
oh gotcha
garry is glychs holiday name
makes sense i guess
mine is jessica
how come?
nvm
if im on holiday and i go out and do things i dont want guys sayin morgan gave me the worst wink wink last night where is he id rather them look for some skank named jessica
brilliant
@Hellstorme told me i give the worst wink winks
that wasn't very kind of him
The appellee and certain amici argue that the fetus is a "person" within the language and meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. In support of this, they outline at length and in detail the well-known facts of fetal development. If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant's case, of course, collapses, [410 U.S. 113, 157] for the fetus' right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the Amendment. The appellant conceded as much on reargument. 51 On the other hand, the appellee conceded on reargument 52 that no case could be cited that holds that a fetus is a person within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment.
mate
my lungs hurt