Message from @MJ->XanderTheLeft-Hander
Discord ID: 446882445258915841
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYGhmJD9LKc
@decaying.dots#6738
yea this is all meme cancer
Peniz
@SquishSquishSquish#3796 Christianity is worst thing for Whites and Norse and Greek mythologies is the second.
Squish left
irl pics of me
The OLB has an account about a small contingent of Fryans left Europe around 1550 BCE with a contingent of sailors from Tyre (Phoenicians) and settled around Ira = Iran. What we know is their descendants are the yazidi who have practice a ethnoreligion to this day Here is a passage that dates to around 1500 BCE from the Yasna Avesta 46:12 that refers to the Tyrrian sailors and the Fryans.
"When among the laudable descendants and posterity of the Turanian Fryana the Right ariseth, through activity of Piety that blesseth substance;"
Here is more passages mentioning Frya and Her bloodline. Khorda Avesta 110 & 120
"We worship the Fravashi of the holy Frya.
We worship the Fravashi of the holy Yoishta, of the Fryana house."
So my claim is the Indo-European language is false and Europe had a independent language. Also there is root words we share orally but we also share those root words with other nonindo- European languages.
The oral words we share are words like mom, papa, brother and sister. We see that other language systems say the same words with a slight accent.
Here is one example of many.
In English we say mom
In Chinese we say Māmā
This shows a direct link in spoken root words from different language family trees.
Chinese is classified as Sino-Tibetan family language while English is classified as Indo-European family language. (Ref 1-2) This shows that the Indo-European is not a independent family language orally.
Now we come to written language. The idea is if the Indo-European language hypothesis is correct about how language came
in with migration of a linear fashion, we will see direct evidence of writing systems being similar in the Indo-European family language. We don't what we see is independent written languages at best influencing each other, but staying very distinct and closer to there origin.
Here is an example of two writing systems merging with one another forming a new system.
Minoan civilization linear script A (Ref 3) (Pic 1).
The proto written language of Europe. (Pic 2)
These languages merged to form Minoan civilization linear script B (Ref 4) (Pic 3).
Here is an example of Sanskrit you can see how it matches linear A and not the other two (Ref 5, 6)
(Pic 4). Sanskrit is classified as Indo-Aryan which under Indo-European.
Now you can see the idea that the Indo-European language origin is a fantasy has no bases.
The genetics says we don't come from one group (Ref 7). Proving any link between Indo and European false.
References:
1. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Tibetan_languages
2. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_languages
3. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_A
4. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_B
5. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanskrit
6. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Iranian_languages
7. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature13673.epdf?referrer_access_token=yX0ZLv9tu1n6O3YGnS8429RgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0MaJb0jOMpBA1y27HQGlCUiHaqx24ysNx_tIj9u3K68hHRwhsiTUksfiVwSad1XvmyrXDeTyxB1FXncqHlwV21QzrRfYOrbfB1DnSCrRDRSlH9wKvGM2LV039bhc02IraQCcX2eVmHqfs5pIWVXwwYnl1W9TZNEs9gGVBGNQSGMXQ%3D%3D&tracking_referrer=www.bbc.com
Ancient Native European languages had a locative case for for things that in English we use "in", "on", "at" and "by". This is different from the ancient languages such as Sanskrit
which had an ablative case as the fifth case which was used to mean things such as "away from" or "with". This case is not present in even modern European languages as it is part of a different language grouping.
Fake News
Das Right
@actual_communist_boi why do communist always project?
https://www.rt.com/news/pedophile-communist-caught-red/
@Deleted User > rt
yikes