Message from @crocodile plate
Discord ID: 529287931807006721
of course a bunch of jungle tribals were gonna be stronger than some random european fella
to the old fat white colonizers?
but when you look at it
what?
colonizers were fat?
lol]
when you look at it from a view
dude it has nothing to do with strength
lemme guess, colonizers had abs of steel @Deleted User ?
xD
it isn't really strength, but economic convenience.
its just straight up cheap labor
^
mhmm
before industrialisation, it was about how much you could produce.
consider this: each race had a standard model
and when you compare those standard models
more land is more wealth, aggregate.
@Deleted User probably not but they werent fat by any means
more land needs more workers.
Okay, but, again, every individual person has different biological traits. You need to be more specific than that.
even so, even if it was purely economic gains, doesnt mean whites were superior
yeah slavery was slightly used in north america cause of the tougher soil
the reason why it wasnt as popular as it was in central or south america
is because of the climate needed for sugar farming
more slaves were sent to sugar farms
slavery only increased in the north due to the cotton gin
If we're measuring purely for phenotypical markers, that's pretty shit, since phenotypes don't really translate well to underlying genetic structure. A single gene contributes up to forty percent of all melanin variation in pigmentation between Europeans and Western Africans, for example. We have tens of thousands of genes.
just bring out the pca charts
lol
in either case, argument is moot
slaverys over
we're moving on
slowly but surely
yeah, and?
does that mean we should flood all homogeneous communities with a mix of different races
soon slavery will be a footnote in history
why not?
why should we?
decreases social cohesion