Message from @crocodile plate
Discord ID: 529287745340833812
there's a clear biological difference between every person in the entire species, i don't see how it's a relevant decider on what is or is not a race.
@crocodile plate otherwise why hire them for slavery instead of droing it yourselves
@Deleted User uhmm
hire for slavery?
lol
right
why did you capture them then?
i know what you mean but thats funny
africans captured them
yeah haha it was
goaded on by the whites
what you mean is why did they buy the slaves and ship em off
because most of them were superior in strength considered to the old fat white colonizers
and ofc the answer is cheap labor
of course a bunch of jungle tribals were gonna be stronger than some random european fella
to the old fat white colonizers?
but when you look at it
what?
colonizers were fat?
lol]
dude it has nothing to do with strength
lemme guess, colonizers had abs of steel @Deleted User ?
xD
it isn't really strength, but economic convenience.
its just straight up cheap labor
^
mhmm
before industrialisation, it was about how much you could produce.
consider this: each race had a standard model
and when you compare those standard models
more land is more wealth, aggregate.
@Deleted User probably not but they werent fat by any means
more land needs more workers.
both races have different biological traits that could seperate them
Okay, but, again, every individual person has different biological traits. You need to be more specific than that.
even so, even if it was purely economic gains, doesnt mean whites were superior
yeah slavery was slightly used in north america cause of the tougher soil
the reason why it wasnt as popular as it was in central or south america
is because of the climate needed for sugar farming
more slaves were sent to sugar farms