Message from @Matt ✠
Discord ID: 323619884137185290
Oh yeah, this is perfect one for @Tedium http://i.imgur.com/DarKLlI.jpg
This is like IM sister site for articles.
Yeah, I saw that before. I always liked Rockwell's explanation of NS
NS is the religion of the natural laws and nature itself in all its immutable fascism; hierarchy.
Can you in a meaningful sense separate American national socialism from fascism?
Historically or contemporarily
Fascism is the prototype. NS is the final model, the ideal.
I think you did @Kombat-Unit when you said fascists were NS who hadn't read Mein Kampf.
Fascism literally just arrived first, Hitler liked it. Then he totally expanded on it to a greater vision than Mussolini ever had, or rather, he had the needed aspects and will to enact it.
My point was, what's the point of going out of your way to make the distinction when you refer to the exact same thing.
The pupil rather, shit.
Mussolini even realized this, and altered HIS views. The mentor became the master.
Too many nuggies.
Fascism is just the italian expression of universal truth with its italian racial flavor, national socialism is the same thing. But national socialism is the closest application of universal truth and natural law ever codified. That's why I'm a nazi.
Yee, basically.
Lol Christopher Cantwell just made this video in defense of (((capitalism))).
I had to lay down the law.
Italian fascism looked back to Ancient Rome, as did the original USA (fascist iconography everywhere in DC!). That may matter to some.
We went so astray from any idea of the Founders.
Once usury and finance power won, without a leader like Jackson, shiieett.
To be sure. It's still something to bring up, makes things hella awkward for the "muh Constitution" conservatives
Iconography doesn't really change the ideology, naturally we have different iconography as well.
I guess you could broadly define fascism as non-nazi application of the universal truth, but unless there's a national component to it, makes it kinda weird why the difference would really matter. Like, if a Slovak for example identified as a fascist because he really identified with Tiso instead of Hitler, fair enough, I guess, but otherwise, y tho dude
but yeah tl;dr same thing
Well
Kind of
Fascism often lacks on the racial questions
Interestingly though, in Slovakia's case, the guy who just made into parlament used to larp wartime fascist, then went full 1488 and got elected
so " fascists were NS who hadn't read Mein Kampf." is true here I guess
Where has fascism lacked racial question?
Mussolini
Already in 1919 Mussolini said that Italy is unified by one racial spirit and struggle to maintain it.
sec
I've heard that from an Italian Fascist as well, though I question the extent to which that is accurate
He didn't act on the JQ until Hitler pressured him
-Speech in Trieste, September 20, 1920
“I have an unbounded faith in the future greatness of the Italian people. Ours is, among the European peoples, the largest and most homogeneous. … Unlike the pessimists who believe that everything is great in other people’s houses, while everything is too small in their own, we have pride in our race and our history.”
From my understanding
Bullshit tho.
Sorry.
-Speech in Trieste, February 6, 1921
“How then was this Fascismo born… it was born of the profound and perennial need of this our Mediterranean and Aryan race…”
But when did he expel the Jews?