I'll be interested to read the difference. He leaves his own mark in the stuff he translates, but that's not necessarily a bad thing.

I like reading different translations as well, there's always something lost in translation, and a new translation is like seeing a new angle, helps get even closer to the original.

Right. For esoteric topics, if you don't read the original language, it's much better to have more than one take on it.

I can actually recommend everything written here: http://ropeculture.org/category/worldview/ virtually everything is written from EH perspective.

Nice. I'll check it out.

http://ropeculture.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/HfO1OxY.png

the graphics on the site are 👌🏻

Brilliant.

http://ropeculture.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/liverpool-683x1024.jpg

Many of the infographics I've linked to are also from the site.

The Universal Truth etc

Surprised I never found that site. Always good to find more info/perspectives.

Oh yeah, this is perfect one for @Tedium http://i.imgur.com/DarKLlI.jpg

This is like IM sister site for articles.

Yeah, I saw that before. I always liked Rockwell's explanation of NS

NS is the religion of the natural laws and nature itself in all its immutable fascism; hierarchy.

Can you in a meaningful sense separate American national socialism from fascism?

Historically or contemporarily

Fascism is the prototype. NS is the final model, the ideal.

I think you did @Kombat-Unit when you said fascists were NS who hadn't read Mein Kampf.

Fascism literally just arrived first, Hitler liked it. Then he totally expanded on it to a greater vision than Mussolini ever had, or rather, he had the needed aspects and will to enact it.

My point was, what's the point of going out of your way to make the distinction when you refer to the exact same thing.

The pupil rather, shit.

Mussolini even realized this, and altered HIS views. The mentor became the master.

Too many nuggies.

Fascism is just the italian expression of universal truth with its italian racial flavor, national socialism is the same thing. But national socialism is the closest application of universal truth and natural law ever codified. That's why I'm a nazi.

Yee, basically.

Lol Christopher Cantwell just made this video in defense of (((capitalism))).

I had to lay down the law.

Italian fascism looked back to Ancient Rome, as did the original USA (fascist iconography everywhere in DC!). That may matter to some.

We went so astray from any idea of the Founders.

Once usury and finance power won, without a leader like Jackson, shiieett.

To be sure. It's still something to bring up, makes things hella awkward for the "muh Constitution" conservatives

Iconography doesn't really change the ideology, naturally we have different iconography as well.

I guess you could broadly define fascism as non-nazi application of the universal truth, but unless there's a national component to it, makes it kinda weird why the difference would really matter. Like, if a Slovak for example identified as a fascist because he really identified with Tiso instead of Hitler, fair enough, I guess, but otherwise, y tho dude

but yeah tl;dr same thing

Well

Kind of

Fascism often lacks on the racial questions

Interestingly though, in Slovakia's case, the guy who just made into parlament used to larp wartime fascist, then went full 1488 and got elected

so " fascists were NS who hadn't read Mein Kampf." is true here I guess