I spent like 5 hours explaining the difference between should, must, and "best practice" to people at my old job.

So I'm fucking anal about my legalese.

But that's not the point, you have a very weird understanding of anarchism
There's absolutely nothing wrong with saying that you disagree with some things or that you think some behaviour is wrong

Sorry Dad

*Triggered*

I'll be more careful about what I say the next time

But yeah, you're right that stupid shit like that is divisive.

The real problem is when you try to force someone to do something

It's like one-issue voters.

It's okay to argue with people trying to change their minds

Exactly

Like these parties in different countries

That are just made to highlight one issue

Like UKIP.

Women's Party

<:kek:519747357076881408>

We had one

Or maybe still have

Will the women's party replace all the chairs to prevent manspreading?

But it's irrelevant nowadays

<:kek:519747357076881408>

That'd be based

I fucking hate males

Manspreading is a violation of the NAP and is **literally** trespassing on public property.

Party of Retirees and Pensioners is my favourite though

Kek

I'm not saying we should prohibit males from entering the public space

But we should.

Going back to America fighting Canada.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fenian_raids

The Fenian Raids

Are my favorite American-Canadian conflict.

So, basically these IRA terrorists get together and they decide that to liberate Ireland, they're gonna take over Canada.

And the US government turns a blind eye to this.

Why is IRA always so based

And they only had like 2000 guys

In total

If even that.

And the start of the raids is just them walking into Canada, which had an undefended border. It took like 3 weeks before any fighting happened.

<:kek:519747357076881408>