Message from @Tato
Discord ID: 601169315118710786
"you shouldnt" and "im not allowing you" are two different things
authority and violence is key
And yeah, I literally said I'm not saying even that
Right but in Laure's opinion, if things were run as he sees them.
There would be some authority to stop them.
What
That's what you said, that's how shoulds work.
I literally said I'm not saying they shouldn't be allowed to do so
Which is like a negation of what you're arguing with
That's not even a strawman
Then why did you say it in the first place?
You're bad at English.
I actually am.
I spent like 5 hours explaining the difference between should, must, and "best practice" to people at my old job.
So I'm fucking anal about my legalese.
But that's not the point, you have a very weird understanding of anarchism
There's absolutely nothing wrong with saying that you disagree with some things or that you think some behaviour is wrong
Sorry Dad
*Triggered*
I'll be more careful about what I say the next time
But yeah, you're right that stupid shit like that is divisive.
The real problem is when you try to force someone to do something
It's okay to argue with people trying to change their minds
Exactly
Like these parties in different countries
That are just made to highlight one issue
Like UKIP.
Women's Party
<:kek:519747357076881408>
We had one
Or maybe still have
Will the women's party replace all the chairs to prevent manspreading?
But it's irrelevant nowadays
<:kek:519747357076881408>
That'd be based
I fucking hate males
Manspreading is a violation of the NAP and is **literally** trespassing on public property.
Party of Retirees and Pensioners is my favourite though
Kek
I'm not saying we should prohibit males from entering the public space
But we should.