https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Cassie_Jo_Stoddart

Oh.

This is the case of the girl they killed

You mean hybristophiles.

You can look up the tape for it

The chicks that worship and venerate serial killers.

TCC girls.

Just cause I know is a lot of single women who get into true crime

What is it with women and fascination with gruesome murders? It seems to be a requirement to being an alternative girl.

Heheheh

Yeaah

I’m an effeminate edgelord so my own knowledge just confirms my previous statement.

But yeah. I think half of them are signaling and saying the Nighstalker is cute is a way to signal while reinforcing your identity.

If they said Hitler was cute while it may be edgy to them it wouldn’t be alternative

I can admit to being interested in the TCC stuff but I don't do any of that weird romanticizing stuff, it's just something that fascinates me.

Any reason in particular?

Idk interest in true crime or murder/detective stuff is kinda Normal amongst women in my experience

They’re just into it

Right but why women?

Bitches love killers.

Women be shopping

You’d think edgy autistic guys but spree killers and terrorists seem more popular among them.

Because serial killers are distinctly tied to modern society, modern post-industrial living, and the modern media.

Post industrial society turned them into rock stars.

More interpersonal is what you’re saying?

I see.

This makes sense. That angle usually doesn’t appeal to men, save Bowie-loving soft bois who are into art and vintage films.

We love them, and we want them. Even in this school shooter era we want their celebrity in the center of the public sphere.

I see.

And it's also the fact that it's juxtaposed against the society that worships them, it's

To put it bluntly and flatly to keep it short,it's anarchistic, because its antisocial.

The other side of the coin for reasons we worship artists and major public figures, it's individualistic, selfish, self determining kind of stuff.

Something that can be considered superhuman, or labeled as subhuman, when the definition of human has been reduced to so little. Worker, consumer, prole.

And finally circling back to the SOCIETY <:society:529540702460444672> <:society:529540702460444672> <:society:529540702460444672> <:society:529540702460444672> <:society:529540702460444672> <:society:529540702460444672>

Aspect of it

Despite their curious differences, they all share curiously distinct and specific traits in their early lives and upbringings that are all the result of modern upbringings and the failings of an uncaring system being responsible for them

But really I can't stand the romanticizing of them, as either attractive or tortured geniuses or whatever.

Most are measurably sub-average and measurably incapable of neurotypical emotions.

They're failed individuals tortured by the system. <:society:529540702460444672>

”Something that can be considered superhuman, or labeled as subhuman, when the definition of human has been reduced to so little. Worker, consumer, prole.”

This is a good take.

I like true crime as well and I couldn’t appreciate these more subtle things until getting older and living with women, as cucky as that sounds.