lol

wwere

lol that was a joke

<:ummmm:511590629797789708>

Ok we can review the logs even without her consent. She effectively relinquished any ownership or claim to intellectual property when clicking submit on the post.

She deleted it but I cant remember if I saved it

A provision would exist that authorities a relevant or proper person to access the logs from time to time of even deleted material for the purposes of checking compliance with rules and TOS respectively.

But staff can delete logs

I want to see the proselytizer's face.

So the real question of the hour is who would like to accompany me as witnesses to guard against misappropriation

React below

In the interest of openness and transparency of course

So I guess she had a fake profile picture several months ago too

@tamara

Dear me

<:monkaW:499687771749744641> where is this even going

This is all so hateful

https://youtu.be/0h5ZxVLDjZY

Just because i said “u’ll never find love haha”

Lol

Dear me

*show me the face of the proselytizer

i will deal with them in my own way*

They used to have a profile pic of them but too late now I guess 🤷

you know that dance

If a person is sworn in as a witness after reciting an oath or affirmation, they can be found guilty of perjury if they knowingly make a false statement that could affect the outcome of a proceeding.

This is the case whether the person is an adult or a child and I’m guessen it’s the same in most jurisdictions so it’s serious shit.

where you turn your butt to someone and look iver your shoulder at them, squat down and alternate stamping your left and right foot

Yum

give me the picture of tam

Lol it wasnt her, but she did have a picture of her face as a pfp a few months ago

oh

nm

Few/several

*we discussed nothing here*

Lol

🤐

found her

mambo

thats an insult to that girl @GrizzlyGuerilla☉♉♈☽♌♍