@Champion then i gotta ask if light can bend at some rate “along” the curve of the earth; wouldn’t that make you think the curve of the earth was projecting like a holodeck the light wave form in the first place? (aka quantum detached sources of electrons hitting your eye... i mean science did say “light” only exists as its registered into “lucidity” beyond that it’s a wavelength; so what makes us think that wavelength isn’t the product of a matrix of chords within a “rift” of lucidity we are channeling/bound within. Perhaps some would even call it a “matrix” of sorts 😄 )

Furthermore the concept makes even more sense in the terms of input/output; its costly to “dream” within an unbound state of lucidity; makes sense why it takes so much passion etc to get/stay there. But what if its been monetized spiritually; aka innately, karmic bonds, etc, as if others can be convinced within this realm to put energy towards others not entering, (don’t wanna say they are leeching the very essence of our divine emerald rays... but the idea of archons came from somewhere.)

To summarize what you just said, "Yes, the light does bend"

from the first paragraph

Yes, that is absolutely an argument to make

"Perhaps some would even call it a “matrix” of sorts 😄 )"

oh alright

Indeed, however beyond that was the point of all the synthetic options/routes the “reality” might function within; because imagine if like those audio tones that you can hear 2 words from; what if sight, memory, smell, etc are all product of this “energy” wavelength being manifest through the pineal gland; and that the current “calcified” state/frequency of the masses is attuned within “saturn” the flesh.

And what substantiates for the hypothesis that light bends? Would any empirical experiment of any light (say, a flash light or head lights) while photos are taken parallel to the lights to illustrate the light bending.?

Have you done such an experiment, or making unproven claims

(not as a response but typed while, response coming soon)

Just saying there are a lot of facets of occult/conspiracy/religion/science that are coming together and all saying reality is a product of willpower, intention, focus, and consciousness upon the background of a greater quantum expression of consciousness “bound”/acting within the laws/essence of what's been said prior; meaning if your willpower/etc grow beyond this default tutorial land level of “matter” you’d start to manifest quantumly pulling reality within those wills, law of attraction kinda jazz... makes sense if you think of reality as a vr game where each player is there own nod free to tune into other servers.

@Champion we are talking about things beyond the standard model and as such would require one to reverse engineer a hypothesis based within an “exact” systems model of this and to look for a pattern where none were thought to be found within something that should by the standard model be “random” or just nothing; then within the finding of this unknown pattern within some observable/measurable perhaps 3rd party double slit kinda jazz where we test the combination of lucid observation vs data collection from instruments then see where is what wavelengths perhaps a cord that can reproduce “this” illusion aka a hologram; I imagine it’d be akin having 2 bodies of “mass” within the exact same bandwidths/chords of energy that somehow tethers them to echo the light shined within; but with equal and opposite (perhaps complementing) polarity as to act as a portal...

So in other words, the theory of light bending is entirely subjective and has no real world empirical evidences or experiments to prove the theory to be true and objective..

which doesn't support any evidence of the earth having any curvature to speculate about

nope they allready did prove it I was hoping you where playing ignorant tho... let me find the videos again

you haven't provided any experiments that you have conducted your self. So far, all you had done was theorize about the bending of light with an opinionated premise

And when asked whether or not you have conducted any experiment yourself, you implied to have not done so

Random youtube videos (which i'm expecting you'll be spamming very soon) do not validate the theory either

There was 2 one was how they mapped the neurons of the mind and seen it produces up to 11 dimensional patterns; the other was within the smallest level of matter, how the white “static” upon your tv screen is akin to this background radiation that in essence is constantly popping in and out as a positive and negative part canceling out before splitting again, and again, and again. And within that “pattern” with computers I’d assume they found that literally its wrote like code to a web page that’s akin to a “linear continuous” thread of code (wrong term there but same ballpark)...

and these are from the leading feilds of science btw

Who's "they"? What are you talking about? Where did they do this? Who are the names? What?

(didn't i say it'd take me a hot minute to find them old video's im refrencing)

this isn't the video but is a direct reference I think to the work; will dig more
http://geometrymatters.com/brain-processes-operate-on-11-dimensions/

i'm not going to watch any youtube videos.. If you really have to send links to youtube videos to discuss the theory, that means you're incapable of defending your theory yourself

ummm wat; i just gave it to you on a silver platter; please ask more if needed

And what does that random link about theory have to do with lighting

that random webpage literally said the word "light" zero times

nice straw man though

well if your brain needs to create 11 dimensional shapes to process reality that's telling me it’s getting 11 dimensional “energies” to attune within and thus aligns with the “11” spirit realms of consciousness, and furthermore the idea that a single “beam” of quantum 12/11 information is being used to produce this “reality” so “light” is already like taking a super computer of data and down scaling/rendering but a fraction into the aspect of light.

you didn't credit your initial theory that "light bends according to a curve', and you're still giving even more theories?

That's if you're not emphasizing on your conditional you started with

well over arching mechanics of manifestation kinda outweigh the concept of why light bend around a shape within a construct of energy wouldn’t it make more sense if you looked at “light” & matter of all kinds as within 1% of the spectrum in existence; then ask yourself if gravity can pull matter to matter so strong; then dark matter making up the 99% sure as hell should play a part in light; and if “bellow” the flat plane of observation lie’s the unrendered synth wave of reality waiting to be called upon I’d say that’s repelling it to say the least.

Yes, everything makes more sense from a self-subjective stand point. That doesn't necessarily mean that point of view is correct

that has nothing to do with darkmatter, or the wave length "fact" of electrons/light/matter

this is what i mean its like a lot of you guys just through out "eh" and just pass it along without building on it... ever

"darkmatter" another theory built on other theories that were also built upon other theories

we're still at point one of your theories

including the spinning ball earth theory

or the heliocentric theory

so captain no theory's you want direct raw personal beliefs or something?

Theories remain as theories; opinionated world views that often have no basis of substantiation or credible, empirical evidences