?rank right

?rank left

?rank traditionalist

?rank capitalist

?rank suspicion

and yet they were first discovered in the 1800s

They are replicas

that's a replica

replicas.

Becuase if there are supposedly millions of the bones, people before the 1800s would have come across them by now, expecially at locations where large underground water aqueducts were

and the first so called fossils were found to be fake

in the 1800s

all the so called fossils in museums are replicas

it says that at the bottom of the museum plates as well, that they are replicas

nice replica

The theory of dinosaurs still remain theoretical

no remains of "dinosaur" bones have ever been discovered on the surface of the earth before the 19th century, UNTIL the 19th century, where people concluded that they were what we know now as dinosaurs, even though paleontologists say some light fossils are supposed to be lightly affected by erosion, leaving remains at the surface of the earth, and not underneath

so why haven't there been any of the dinosaur bones been discovered at the surface

if they ever existed

Evolution in a nutshell

>All ball earthers were conditioned and mentally programmed from birth to think they live on a spinning lollipop with the stick representing the spinning axis meant to be earth. These minds are programmed to never question what they were indoctrinated to believe.

>All Flat Earthers are people with a tremendous mental capacity and a proven level of discernment that surpasses beyond imagination because they questioned what they were indoctrinated to believe, experimented about the shape of the earth, and came up with a conclusion that the human senses prove a Flat Geocentric Earth.

Another midget minded premise is to question flat earth with a presupposed ball earth theory

like the guy just demonstrated

The moon is already concluded to be a self luminous celestial object that has its own phases

Putting things in perspective, this light becomes more circular as it becomes more vertical above you

and just because something gives off light and has phases doesnt mean it's all of the sudden a ball with the sun reflecting light on it

The moon always has the same phase in the light shade, for thousands of years since creation

Another reasoning behind how celestial bodies are a few thousand feet from earth is the frequent display of clouds appearing to be behind the sun/moon

Other visuals on a ball would to wrongly conclude that light curves as it adjusts to the curve of the ball

Definition of a retard: someone who calls other people names merely because they're incapable of making any valid or reasonable rebuttals to a given argument

Astronauts displaying the earth's horizontal plane rising to the eye level as altitude rises

To summarize what you just said, "Yes, the light does bend"

from the first paragraph

Yes, that is absolutely an argument to make

"Perhaps some would even call it a “matrix” of sorts 😄 )"

oh alright

And what substantiates for the hypothesis that light bends? Would any empirical experiment of any light (say, a flash light or head lights) while photos are taken parallel to the lights to illustrate the light bending.?

Have you done such an experiment, or making unproven claims

So in other words, the theory of light bending is entirely subjective and has no real world empirical evidences or experiments to prove the theory to be true and objective..

which doesn't support any evidence of the earth having any curvature to speculate about

you haven't provided any experiments that you have conducted your self. So far, all you had done was theorize about the bending of light with an opinionated premise

And when asked whether or not you have conducted any experiment yourself, you implied to have not done so

Random youtube videos (which i'm expecting you'll be spamming very soon) do not validate the theory either

Who's "they"? What are you talking about? Where did they do this? Who are the names? What?

i'm not going to watch any youtube videos.. If you really have to send links to youtube videos to discuss the theory, that means you're incapable of defending your theory yourself

And what does that random link about theory have to do with lighting

that random webpage literally said the word "light" zero times

nice straw man though

you didn't credit your initial theory that "light bends according to a curve', and you're still giving even more theories?

That's if you're not emphasizing on your conditional you started with

Yes, everything makes more sense from a self-subjective stand point. That doesn't necessarily mean that point of view is correct

"darkmatter" another theory built on other theories that were also built upon other theories

we're still at point one of your theories

including the spinning ball earth theory

or the heliocentric theory

Theories remain as theories; opinionated world views that often have no basis of substantiation or credible, empirical evidences

like the big bang theory, water ball earth theory, theory of gravity, and so on and so forth

Just like the alleged 93 million mile distance of the sun to the earth (theory) built upon the heliocentric theory

what does that have to do with anything

I asked for real, empirical evidences or experiments, to credit those theories

but you instead gave more theories

Like the alleged 93 million mile distance of the sun to the earth (theory) built upon the heliocentric theory, which would only be credible of nasa traveled to the sun, touched it, and then came back to earth while measuring how far the journey was

take this for example

NASA's official claim states that the earth spinns 66,666 mph around the sun

and google changed it a few years back to "about 67,000"

Credit: Official Nasa short clipped video of the rotation of the earth sped up 10x

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/454874479332687882/534267021148291072/nasagif.gif?width=375&height=375

Nasa somehow has the power to make clouds freeze in time

nasa.gov

But if you believe the earth is a ball like everyone was programmed to believe, you don't have right to question it

The oceans and continents change color and size frequently

bak to back*

Different images, same Computer Generated Image

im out

Its from nasa.gov

@Smoothie Mane Explain the CGI images I provided

From nasa*

That's literally the official mainstream NASA images of the earth from year to year but ok

denial is another attribute of self guilt

@Post-LSD Swamp Wheres the edges of the universe

What's to gain from keeping the "flat earth a secret?"

Who wouldn't lie for a $400,000 salary at NASA

I'm pretty sure almost everyone would lie on a daily basis for that kind of money

hemisphere is still a presupposed heliocentric view

and either way

Either way, the moon looks the same way on different parts of the earth as it does on a theoretical ball earth

anyways

<insert cringey troll>

Yes it does

its 2019 and people still cant tell the difference between circular and round

no

it would appear sideways or upside down, as it's supposed to appear on a flat earth

Moon faces earth from the same point of view, since creation

faces earth at the same angle always