I like the assumption that it's hard to find a handfull of math minor graduates.

"The math is too complex . . . humans cannot do this. Maybe some real college type people, but not humans."

And yet I recall some students went out and did some crop circle stuff and talked about how they did it and it sparked kind of a renaissance.

``` To prove their case they made a circle in front of journalists; a "cereologist" (advocate of paranormal explanations of crop circles), Pat Delgado, examined the circle and declared it authentic before it was revealed that it was a hoax.[9][34][35] Inspired by Australian crop circle accounts from 1966, Bower and Chorley claimed to be responsible for all circles made prior to 1987, and for more than 200 crop circles in 1978–1991 (with 1000 other circles not being made by them).[10][36] After their announcement, the two men demonstrated making a crop circle. According to Professor Richard Taylor, "the pictographs they created inspired a second wave of crop artists. Far from fizzling out, crop circles have evolved into an international phenomenon, with hundreds of sophisticated pictographs now appearing annually around the globe."[10]```

¬¬¬SmartSelect_20190212-193859_Chrome.jpg.

¬¬¬¬¬¬@darth_brando

¬¬¬close.

@root Its been a month

and the showing on these daily debates is been absalute shit

o

derailed

everyday

theres some good engadgement

kinda

from some users

maybe you expect too much from us simple souls <:pepe4:352652870820167680>

to stay on topic

and do a lil investigative research

@root is this to much to ask for?

oh no

that's right, i am qanon

u left and came back

ya

<:sadcat:511590629856378901>

what should we debate about @root

***Who is qanon***

new day new topic

just extend the qanon?

who is chad

<:chad:511591543958667266>

figure out who chad is you find out who qanon is <:PPepoDetect:520207064807636994>

debate should be drones though

Q is a group of goobers acting out a live action story

<@440902571557912577> on the chilbolton man face pic

the face is done via pointalist expression of binary where the 1s (dark blocks) and 0s (pressed down crops) are the pixels. decoding the images true face would be easier if resolution format was known and if there was any other like message in the binary on how to reformat that would help as well

@Post-LSD Swamp Do you have proof?

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/267333726269210624/545264020714684436/image0.jpg Someone sent this on another server as warning

@.𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓮𝓬𝓱𝓪𝓭 May, I have your, definition of this?

Please. Thank you.

666

<:mk:511588951811817480> Who or what is 666 <:mk:511588951811817480> Daily Debate tyme! <:mk:511588951811817480> @everyone

Join vc for in depth convo's!

satan

it's me. And u