Message from @Enjoying the Crisis
Discord ID: 633148640537608202
Would it be better to get a monocular or one of these mall ninja looking headband set ups?
what do you mean by that
how are those mutually exclusive
I see some single tubes for $250, and some double tube headsets going for $20 more
Yeah
Definitely buy those
🤔
It’s a great deal
no
<:gearcheck:559943765570355210>
twice the nightvision for only 20 bucks more huh
I read further in, apparently refurbished
Is this a good deal?
😬
yes
>digital
@CTL I think it's been so long since the Army approved a new name for a generation that companies want to make it clear that the newer tech is being included, not the minimum for gen 3.
solar pls
Well the Army is going digital HUD with fusion as an interim so there's really not a need, but what I meant is those "gen 4" specs that ATN put out aren't any better than gen 3
tbh using generation to describe the overall quality nightvision is smoothbrain knuckledragger tier
FOM is the patrician rating
Huh, this Sightmark doesnt look too bad. Now lets say I mount this on a bump helmet, whats a good brand for that?
fusion isn't really gen 3+ either since it doesn't effect the imaging quality of the intensifier
I keep hearing arguments between high vs low cut
epin
they're actually usable depending on application if you have a standalone IR illuminator
but for anything tactical they're garbage
>high vs low cut
Super high cut or die
Any reason?
Unless you're actually CAG
poor focus that needs to be adjusted all the time, 100% dependant on infrared light to see, no ambient light amplification
cag using high cuts over super high is an smh tbh
Big facts
Ok, Ill have to save up a bit for some legit stuff then. And maybe ask around to see what other people got.
gen 1 is good for stationary observation of things that are not able to see infrared light
4 hole with direct mounted gsgm is 100000 IQ tho