Message from @Snowback
Discord ID: 633147479423975426
π€
ATN is like the Holosun of NVGs
you don't have the atf role anymore
Decent shit, but ugly af and heavy af sin
you can stop being funny and relatable now
@Snowback Is that a good starter or a waste at that point? I know nothing about NVGs
@fjogert hop off my dick, girl. sitting in a vc channel aint flashing news
yes
>flashing news
what?
Would it be better to get a monocular or one of these mall ninja looking headband set ups?
what do you mean by that
how are those mutually exclusive
I see some single tubes for $250, and some double tube headsets going for $20 more
Yeah
Definitely buy those
π€
Itβs a great deal
no
<:gearcheck:559943765570355210>
I read further in, apparently refurbished
Is this a good deal?
π¬
yes
>digital
@CTL I think it's been so long since the Army approved a new name for a generation that companies want to make it clear that the newer tech is being included, not the minimum for gen 3.
solar pls
It's a made up generation because the Army won't name it.
Well the Army is going digital HUD with fusion as an interim so there's really not a need, but what I meant is those "gen 4" specs that ATN put out aren't any better than gen 3
tbh using generation to describe the overall quality nightvision is smoothbrain knuckledragger tier
FOM is the patrician rating
Huh, this Sightmark doesnt look too bad. Now lets say I mount this on a bump helmet, whats a good brand for that?
fusion isn't really gen 3+ either since it doesn't effect the imaging quality of the intensifier
I keep hearing arguments between high vs low cut
epin
they're actually usable depending on application if you have a standalone IR illuminator
but for anything tactical they're garbage