Message from @EZflats
Discord ID: 633149744666902528
😬
yes
>digital
@CTL I think it's been so long since the Army approved a new name for a generation that companies want to make it clear that the newer tech is being included, not the minimum for gen 3.
solar pls
It's a made up generation because the Army won't name it.
Well the Army is going digital HUD with fusion as an interim so there's really not a need, but what I meant is those "gen 4" specs that ATN put out aren't any better than gen 3
tbh using generation to describe the overall quality nightvision is smoothbrain knuckledragger tier
FOM is the patrician rating
Huh, this Sightmark doesnt look too bad. Now lets say I mount this on a bump helmet, whats a good brand for that?
fusion isn't really gen 3+ either since it doesn't effect the imaging quality of the intensifier
I keep hearing arguments between high vs low cut
epin
they're actually usable depending on application if you have a standalone IR illuminator
but for anything tactical they're garbage
>high vs low cut
Super high cut or die
Any reason?
poor focus that needs to be adjusted all the time, 100% dependant on infrared light to see, no ambient light amplification
cag using high cuts over super high is an smh tbh
Big facts
Ok, Ill have to save up a bit for some legit stuff then. And maybe ask around to see what other people got.
gen 1 is good for stationary observation of things that are not able to see infrared light
4 hole with direct mounted gsgm is 100000 IQ tho
New focus is getting comms to a passable level
but only if they are within the range of the light of your IR illuminator
handmic and baofeng
Thats it?
Shit nvm ok I got that then, guess it'll be a crye jpc
maybe a better antenna
Got that too, collapsible 36"
🤷🏿 there's really not much middle ground for comms
Might get one of those ridiculous 6' ones that folds down hm
Nah, JPC and belt first
Get that TRI prc-148 action
gang gang
I probably never would've even looked at crye if I wasn't told it here that it's not a meme company