Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 410128422598213632
fuck this shit im out
i'm condemning white nationalists you dingus
where in there did i suggest all christians are white nationalists
i said all nationalists are usually christians
is the average iq of an american -50??
religious*
@Syndicalist Nah, more of a muslim thing.
wasn't the guy that betrayed jesus a jew?
Yep.
????
even so, it's so much easier to see posts online from white nationalists claiming shit like "the new world order is run by the jews"
man at least in the middle east they dont say stupid shit like that they just hate them because they hate everyone
@Shwiani please never enter the sphere of politics again, thank you
@Syndicalist What?
I have never heard the "NWO" term used unironically before.
ok one sec
here you go
Nice strawman.
nice no true scotsman
Yet you are purposefully picking through all of the other sources, and using it to represent all of the people.
It's like if I used www.theonion to represent the left wing.
the term 'mostly' has been degraded to "everyone" it seems
the onion?
dude, that site is satirical, smoloko is not
you could've used r/socialism
How do you know if it is satirical or isn't?
because it's implied???
I could afterall make the claim that the onion ISN'T satirical.
didn't take that much searching
if wikipedia isn't your style
This has gotten a bit away from the original point, why use a strawman?
what makes me sending you a white nationalist website that states the "NWO" claim unironically several times over after you saying and i copy and pase"*I have never heard the "NWO" term used unironically before.*"
how is that a strawman*
it's an answer to your question, i could pull more examples it's just the first that came to my mind
another wonderful place to find things like this is the youtube comment section
Take a trip throughout /pol/, r/thedonald, and more, you will probably never see the term NWO used once, you are quite literally using a strawman.
thedonald?
that's a white supremacist board?