I mean reuters is regarded as one of the most unbiased news sources out there along with the Associated Press

So was CNN

I think vice did too. I assume so considering the amount of viewers they have.

People watch news because they believe it.

I could care less how biased they are, I care about how much they lie. And scummy journalists lie a lot.

I mean it's not like reuters could possibly use multiple sources or journalists on the ground while keeping opinion to a minimum

Read above.

well the video's right there if you don't believe me

Im watching but I dont believe it.

now here's the million dollar question

if they're lying then what are they lying about?

Could be everything for all I know. Journalists lie a lot.

if you can't actually point out any lies in their video then how can you tell that they're lying?

By pointing out lies from other journalists

such as...?

the right

such as?

trump, shapiro and milo

and centrists like JP

now are any of these people hired by reuters?

No but journalists are very greedy

So I wont take it on their word

so there must be raw footage available from other sources then, right?

can you find footage that disproves the 30 protestor claim?

Some yes

Im not assed to find one right now

then don't make claims that you won't bother to support

But I'll probably watch a youtuber about it soon

Im not making a claim

is "journalists are very greedy" a claim?

other than journalists being greedy and lie alot

thats a fact

then there must be evidence to back it up

can you present any?

I could but I cba to do your job for you.

backing up your claims isn't my job

that's not how a debate works

Not a claim. A fact.

Never said it was your job either. I said looking for evidence is your job.

if you can't find evidence to back it up then you can't call it a fact

Good thing I can find evidence.