Also in Tito times it was called socialist management,titoism was product of soviet propaganda as far as I know

You mean "yugoslav revisionism"

Selfmanagment*

How was selfmanagment of workers revisionism?

ertrhythtyht6ut67i67uiy67o78

8i57u568u67ikyuhjnukhyujkm#

@Musketar (Alex) fuck you

dog russian

your mum needs to get raped

by a nigger

fuck you

Because they claimed that only centralized plan economu is only true

fuck your mum

fuck your dad

get cancer

dog shit russian

You serious or just joking?

i look forward to make slavs a slave race again

and making a harem of slavs

That's not me it's Soviet propaganda

**Stalin propaganda**

Soviets abandoned their propaganda after Stalin died

Stalin got personal with tito when Tito denayed NKVD accses in jugo

~~so he sent 22 assassins and made propaganda~~

This is part of so-called "fight on two fronts". Right-wing tendency in communist movement was yugoslavian revisionism and on ultra-leftist Chinese sectarianism and primitive egalitartian communism (maoism) left tendency.

@Musketar (Alex) shutup

stalin was a jew

Didn't jugoslavija revisionism come after Tito?

the ussr was zionist propaganda

With milosevic changing to social democrats

And nationalism,....

"Self-management" was part of yugoslav revisionism

So workers should not own their bussnises with worker councils under authority of the party

This is collective property but not all-people one. Communist tendency is about socialization of means of production to property of all society.

Can you rephrase that

Oh you ment on non collectivised or?

Industries became not property of socialist state (this is formal socialization) which belonged to all working people but collectives of this indutries. We had collective property in agriculture (kolkhozy were collective property).

They were not property of the state directly but state still controlled it via peasent councils that were part of the party,and there were farms and factories which were under direct authority of the state

Socialization is more further then collectivisation. Collectivisation is progress instead of big amount of small producers.

?

~~rephrase pls~~