there were none in those days either

other than he was authoritarian and killed people

the communists just copied and pasted him with marxism

but even in French revolution existed babouvists who were first communists

you could just be capitalist without being authoritarian

and be far more successful

there's no denying that the west did far better

Russia I believe has potential though, if it wasnt so corrupt and stook to a better and updated constitution in politics

which wont happen any time soon

or perhaps at all

ukraine on the other hand is redeemable imo

if they became eu and/or nato members

then I'll except them as europeans and westerners

and then they'll be the only big amount of orthodox slavs I accept.

It would be corrupt as this is part of periphery capitalism, so to struggle against corruption we need fight against causes which is capitalist system

no its not part of that.

Many countries arent corrupt and are capitalist

And all tendencies in Russia are about new revolutionary situation

@Mr. X man even US very corrupt

I highly doubt it would be productive

the US isnt that corrupt believe it or not

not compared to russia or brazil

but there more legalised corrutpion

or Japan

no they dont legalize corruption

There are enough corruptions in West

america's whole thing is making sure the government doesnt have too much power

not much

but well there is more social control

How so?

While in Russia this thing not exist nowdays

In the media that's true but its with the free press that also enables people to learn the truth

so there's battle between the press

"Free press" all belongs to corporations

which is a good thing

its way better than a one sided government

For capitalists yed

social control definitely exists in russia too

No

no for any civilisation

All social control would be prevented