ok.

thank god we dont have a welfare state

i lived with an illegal immigrant, its hard for them to do *anything* even go to the doctor

the problem comes simply from anchor babies and chain migration. if we just have the wall and put a ban on pregnant women from entering the country wed be fine

rip germany though

sad...

hopefully republicans can hold enough power to prevent the u.s. from becoming a welfare state

https://www.npr.org/2019/01/16/686056668/for-seventh-consecutive-year-visa-overstays-exceeded-illegal-border-crossings

the wall won't stop illegal immigrants who enter legally and overstay their visa

so it'll stop less than half of illegal immigration assuming it has a 100% effectiveness rate

Building a wall will make people find new ways to cross

how about instead of building a wall we go back and stop what the CIA started

under worldwide communism there wouldnt be any refugees.

wall has benefits, you just wont hear about them because the propaganda media + google bias

it reduced immigration by 99% in israel

AND in hungary

also ramping up detection at entry points will mean more will come through where the wall will be. its going to be neccessary

@DA GOMMIE JOO

you genuinely do not want to talk about israel and walls

https://www.hrw.org/news/2004/02/22/israel-west-bank-barrier-violates-human-rights

https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=16449

and the hungary wall is also considered a human rights violation

so basically let's violate human rights because we can't go ten years without fucking a central/south american country up

considered a human rights violation by who? democrats? protecting their economies from hordes of impoverished people that want to come in and would need free services is just practical. its not a human rights violation to lock your door with a hundred homeless people outside.

human rights watch generally doesn't show political bias

they have a pretty good track record of journalism

well characterizing a wall as a human rights violation... like yes, its better for refugees if theres not a wall. That point doesnt end the discussion though. democrats act like it does...

“Israel’s separation barrier seriously impedes Palestinian access to essentials of civilian life, such as work, education and medical care.”

"The Human Rights Watch briefing paper argues that the barrier imposes arbitrary and excessive restrictions on the freedom of movement of tens of thousands of Palestinians and violates Israel’s obligation under the Geneva Conventions to ensure the welfare of the population under occupation."

“The settlements violate the Geneva Conventions’ prohibition against transfers of population and have gravely affected Palestinian access to basics like employment, land and water,”

violating the geneva conventions is generally considered a big deal

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2017/02/usa-free-young-mother-detained-by-immigration-authorities-for-15-months/
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2017/03/usa-young-mother-with-brain-tumor-released-from-immigration-detention-centre/

here's two amnesty articles documenting how a woman who legally immigrated was arrested and refused treatment for a brain tumor for 15 months

now you tell me
is refusing someone critical medical care because they attempted to legally migrate to a country through established methods considered okay?