Again that info was provided by an unreliable source

aka the soviets

prove the CIA wrong then

Its the soviets not the cia that got the source

although the cia has been wrong a lot

prove them wrong then

@tao lin its not false info, but it's not true info too. It seems to be cherrypicked. average calory consuption doesnt mean that there weren't parts with much lower calory consuption

Information of soviets lying is pretty easy to find, google it

how is it cherrypicked?

"the soviets lied on some things, so they must have lied about everything!"

flawless logic

No they lied on a lot of things, not some things

almost as flawless as "google it"

especially when it came to stuff like this

you mean parts of the ussr’s 80 year odd history?

obviously in the beginning they had a drought. famines were a regular thing, especially in the russian empire

and the ussr

what also made it worse is bourgeoisie landlords aka kulaks actively held and burned grain for a profit

they lived in the rural area

Good people

all of the ussr was in a famine, especially in

ok you’re trolling

anyway

Im joking yeah but they didnt burn grain

all of the USSR was in famine, especially in the inner city (factories)

kazakhstan: hey we just had a drought and we need food
moscow: okay
moscow: ukraine can you give kazakhstan some food
ukraine: *burns all the food*
moscow: ***you're not helping***

Due to socialism

http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/history/mwh/russia/stalincollectivisationrev_print.shtml

lolno
kazakhstan today has issues with famine

>When ukraine has all the food

somehow

ukraine were the farmers

they made the food

the inner city didn’t

Not all no

even so thats shitty planning

ukraine is part of the breadbasket of europe

woah

they grow most of europe's food

if you're going to ask anyone for food it's them

mr e is also a historian now