>When ukraine has all the food

somehow

ukraine were the farmers

they made the food

the inner city didn’t

Not all no

even so thats shitty planning

ukraine is part of the breadbasket of europe

woah

they grow most of europe's food

if you're going to ask anyone for food it's them

mr e is also a historian now

No europe and america grows most of europes food

No I just know basic shit

yknow what I love is the propaganda that kulaks were ‘peasants’ and ‘poor farmers :((‘

Kulak, (Russian: “fist”), in Russian and Soviet history, a wealthy or prosperous peasant, generally characterized as one who owned a relatively large farm and several head of cattle and horses and who was financially capable of employing hired labour and leasing land.

>ukraine doesn't grow food, europe grows food!
>doesn't know that ukraine is in europe

when you’re a land owner and a serf owner but you’re still a poor peasant

@DA GOMMIE JOO I do

thats a strawman bat

Ukraine fucked up some poles people gloss over in charactarizing Russian insurgence- they got like Vlad the Impaler on resident poles after WW2

>when you've had famines for hundreds of years but the one time you have a famine under socialism it's because socialism is evil

inb4 "yes"

Not as bad of famines in socialism

http://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/CA0855EN

dude they're suffering a locust infestation today

I mean the socialist famines were a lot worse

Okay, again not communism nor capitalism

Anyway gotta eat

peace

Eat products of capitalism or socialism?

*famine occurs under capitalism*
"no no that's just the material conditions"
*famine occurs under socialism*
"HOW MANY MORE LIVES MUST SOCIALISM CLAIM?!"

Its because of socialism google it

lesson learned: if socialism doesn't immediately and flawlessly fix every single problem in a country then it's socialism's fault for not being perfect

dude the 1919-21 famine was caused by the civil war

No thats not my point

thats a strawman

Sure and what about the rest?

Straw Man

Creating a distorted or simplified caricature of your opponent's argument, and the arguing against that.

'You say Israel should stop building settlements on the West Bank in violation of the treaty, so you're saying Israel doesn't have the right to be a nation?'

Shared From Logical Defence Application

Mhm