@Ｋ▲ＩＳＥＲ Pinochet was a faggot.

**nigga**

**could you not tell by the ancap smiley face that I was joking**

@Ｋ▲ＩＳＥＲ He ruined chile, but because he killed commies that makes him the best thing since canned bread? Right?

how does that negate that the US has, for the whole of the 20th century, interfered with the economic life and political process of MANY countries, and that this STATE imperialism somehow always leads to new markets for corporation?

@yung How did it?

Pinochet, also installed and advised by the US btw

@Deleted User nigga it did.

@yung That isn't an answer.

I asked you a question bruh

you answer me

prick

And let me remind you, batista and pinochet installed themselves, the US only supported them.

@yung Whole of the 20th Century?

20th I think I wrote, no?

let me correct myself

Latter half, definitely.

^^

yes sorry it was just to make reference of the time

@yung What I am stating is that the US didn't actually do that, because it was the corporations in the US that existed there and controlled the majority of business, if it was imperialistic, they would have been owned by the US government.

After the Berlin Blockade is when the US went full “where the commies at” mode.

@Ｋ▲ＩＳＥＲ Which is why the US supported such dictators.

Corporations don’t have the legal power to invade countries bruh

Mhm.

They don’t. Collusion with government is somehow needed

Or at least they can’t after the BETC

@Deleted User Thus the reason I called the US’s foreign policy shit.

@yung They didn't invade militaristically though, they were granted permission to set up shop there, and due to them being based in the US, they absolutely destroyed competition.

@Ｋ▲ＩＳＥＲ Seems they still keep a similar model, looking at their middle east policies.

Nonono The US has engaged in economic imperialism as you described, and you’re right in that.
But militaristic invasion happened either independently, or in coordination with this economic imperialism you talk about. The US simply has sent its troops to invade countless countries.

@yung I didn't state that it was imperialism you dumbass, ans neither did militaristic imperialism occur.

Yes ahahaha US troops have never been mobilized

Cool story dude

They sure as hell have been mobilized but never for imperialism in the 20th century.

They have though. It’s incredible how you can deny this.

How did they then?

By doing it? lmao?

Wow, what an example.

@Deleted User Agreed, with Assad, Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein and such.

Fuck that took a while.

@Ｋ▲ＩＳＥＲ Gaddafi would have helped libya so much.