Message from @yung
Discord ID: 435980842053926933
@yung What? The US dropped support for him because he was becoming a criminal dictator, and was ruining cuba, JFK even called him so.
Very un suspicious right? You install a military dictator and then distance yourself from him once he gets too crazy. Of course they’d do this
And this is AS IF Batista was the one dictator who was installed by CIA
I love America, but even I can admit my country’s foreign policy is bullshit.
@yung Um what? Woulden't you do the same if the dictator you helped install did the same?
Yes I would. To save face.
Only good dictator was Pinochet. <:bour:313709044957315082>
Obviously you would, because it would have shown that your foreign policy was failing.
@Ｋ▲ＩＳＥＲ Pinochet was a faggot.
**nigga**
**could you not tell by the ancap smiley face that I was joking**
@Ｋ▲ＩＳＥＲ He ruined chile, but because he killed commies that makes him the best thing since canned bread? Right?
how does that negate that the US has, for the whole of the 20th century, interfered with the economic life and political process of MANY countries, and that this STATE imperialism somehow always leads to new markets for corporation?
@yung How did it?
Pinochet, also installed and advised by the US btw
@Deleted User nigga it did.
@yung That isn't an answer.
I asked you a question bruh
you answer me
And let me remind you, batista and pinochet installed themselves, the US only supported them.
20th I think I wrote, no?
let me correct myself
Latter half, definitely.
^^
yes sorry it was just to make reference of the time
@yung What I am stating is that the US didn't actually do that, because it was the corporations in the US that existed there and controlled the majority of business, if it was imperialistic, they would have been owned by the US government.
After the Berlin Blockade is when the US went full “where the commies at” mode.
@Ｋ▲ＩＳＥＲ Which is why the US supported such dictators.
Corporations don’t have the legal power to invade countries bruh
Mhm.
They don’t. Collusion with government is somehow needed
Or at least they can’t after the BETC
@Deleted User Thus the reason I called the US’s foreign policy shit.
@yung They didn't invade militaristically though, they were granted permission to set up shop there, and due to them being based in the US, they absolutely destroyed competition.
@Ｋ▲ＩＳＥＲ Seems they still keep a similar model, looking at their middle east policies.
Nonono The US has engaged in economic imperialism as you described, and you’re right in that.
But militaristic invasion happened either independently, or in coordination with this economic imperialism you talk about. The US simply has sent its troops to invade countless countries.
@yung I didn't state that it was imperialism you dumbass, ans neither did militaristic imperialism occur.
Yes ahahaha US troops have never been mobilized