In that case, you're more than free to browse the many other translations, or even the original Koine, if you'd like to yourself.

And what I am pointing out is that as the translations have come and gone as time goes on, they have lost the original point that christianity had, for the most trustworthy source you would have to get it from perhaps the first bible.

Which is why I pointed out you're free to read the Latin Vulgate or the Koine New Testament.

Which happened thousands of years later after so much.

Er... no, the Koine is the original and the Vulgate is the 4th Century Latin translation officially used by the Catholic Church.

The vulgate wasn't even recognized as legitimate until the 1500's.

And what? I see nothing stating that the koine version of the bible even existed.

The only koine version I see is a greek translation.

You sure you know what you are talking about?

You know that Koine is Greek, right?

Yep, and I am fairly certain that jesus didn't live in athens.

I'm also fairly certain that the Bible was never claimed to be written by Jesus.

When did I claim that?

' I see nothing stating that the koine version of the bible even existed. '

The warrant here is that the Koine version is a Greek translation,

And?

Which is false, because the original New Testament was written in Greek.

What?

The original New Testament was written in Koine Greek.

Mmm, I doubt that.

Do you have any citations?

Do I need a citation to doubt something?

dude it literally was lmao

Yes, you do.

Doubt must have reasonable evidence.

Otherwise it's doubt for doubt's sake.

@Uninteresting It was because it was? That doesn't make sense.

the original copies were written in a time period where greek was very prevalent

@Deleted User ur trying to deny a basic fact m8

@Chaiske And is doubt unable to be made because of a lack of evidence?

the evidence is piled against you in this claim that ur making

@Uninteresting I am sure that people spoke greek in palestine.

Doubt is simply pointless without evidence to back it up.

And yes, they did. Palestine was a Roman province, and the lingua franca of Eastern Rome generally was Koine Greek.

and they didnt write it all in palestine as well

@Chaiske And is doubt pointless if there is lacking evidence behind the opposing persons argument?

the new testament that is

@Chaiske Because the palestinians sure were romans.

Yes, they were Roman citizens under Roman rule.

@Uninteresting So the bible was written in palestine, and most of the new testament?

And no, the Bible wasn't written in Palestine.