Message from @tao lin

Discord ID: 491078015858769930


2018-09-17 02:42:55 UTC  

The imperialists would have obliterated the nation long ago if it wasn't for china

2018-09-17 02:43:19 UTC  

they'd never nuke the DPRK. Imperialism is something the bourgeoisie *have* to do. its not just for a few more dollars. Like I said the dprk has untold amount of cheap labor even China is after.

2018-09-17 02:44:05 UTC  

Exactly, that's why they haven't been invaded, nuked is a hyperbole, but still, they are allied with China, cheap labor for portection

2018-09-17 02:44:18 UTC  

So much for self reliance

2018-09-17 02:44:26 UTC  

And china wouldnt be allied if they were anything but Juche.

2018-09-17 02:44:31 UTC  

So my point still stands

2018-09-17 02:45:04 UTC  

"Self reliance"
Relies entirely upon China to survive, yeah makes sense

2018-09-17 02:45:22 UTC  

And let's not even mention the people on the country

2018-09-17 02:45:31 UTC  

It doesn't matter, you're deviating. They're still able to survive massive massive embargos

2018-09-17 02:45:40 UTC  

Not surviving well

2018-09-17 02:45:44 UTC  

if we talk econ theyre practically a one man army with the exception of china.

2018-09-17 02:46:22 UTC  

Since the USSR collapsed they have been starving, so I wouldn't say surviving, and the government isn't treating it's people too well to say the least

2018-09-17 02:46:48 UTC  

Typically people starve when the entire world embargos you.

2018-09-17 02:46:59 UTC  

regardless the scale is extremely exaggerated.

2018-09-17 02:47:19 UTC  

Of course, but also those other things like basic human rights, they are kinda ignored

2018-09-17 02:47:43 UTC  

How so? Because an uncle wants to short the DRPK?

2018-09-17 02:47:57 UTC  

An already fragile economy?

2018-09-17 02:48:19 UTC  

So that is justification for restricting freedom of speech, and basic liberties?

2018-09-17 02:48:29 UTC  

My main criticism is the party keeps electing kim family members

2018-09-17 02:48:41 UTC  

Well yes they are a dynasty for a reason

2018-09-17 02:48:42 UTC  

Like?

2018-09-17 02:49:11 UTC  

based

2018-09-17 02:49:14 UTC  

Like? Are you kidding me? Are you that unaware of current events?

2018-09-17 02:49:33 UTC  

Basic liberties is very broad

2018-09-17 02:50:07 UTC  

Freedom of speech, expression, opposing the party, lgbtq

2018-09-17 02:50:37 UTC  

Gay

2018-09-17 02:51:38 UTC  

Thirdworldperspective, what type of name is that?

2018-09-17 02:52:17 UTC  

lgbtq yes I agree they're shit at it because they're reactionary. Unfortunately thats mainly a cultural issue above all else. But freedom of speech, expression, and opposing the parties are punished. Apparently it's cold war fears (like what the berlin wall was originally for) regardless they too are lacking heavily.

2018-09-17 02:52:29 UTC  

Its the name of my thirdworldist channel.

2018-09-17 02:52:49 UTC  

Lol oogaboogaism

2018-09-17 02:53:17 UTC  

thirdworldism = no f*rst world proletariat (revolutionary proles to nitpick)

2018-09-17 02:53:44 UTC  

There is no reason to support the DPRK, they are a despotic ruthless monarchy, I see no reason to defend them

2018-09-17 02:53:47 UTC  

Much better than starving to death imo

2018-09-17 02:54:19 UTC  

remember jailing liberals is the only way to save western society

2018-09-17 02:54:20 UTC  

The DPRK under Maoist thought has a right to self determination. It's either the DPRK or the US rapes it, in the case of the korean war with troops literally.

2018-09-17 02:54:47 UTC  

Which is why I also support Syria even though its bourg as fuck

2018-09-17 02:55:01 UTC  

>Relying on the DPRK to fight the US <:GWcorbinTopKek:384871333705678868>

2018-09-17 02:55:09 UTC  

I'd rather the US rapes dprk, because at least then communists could have somewhat of a voice

2018-09-17 02:55:11 UTC  

They won <:GWcorbinFeelsDabMan:385111042218262529>

2018-09-17 02:55:28 UTC  

DPRK is too despicable