Wiki isnt a fantastic source and its not all about tanks

the USA contributed less than 5% of the soviet union's tanks

okay

find a better source

not my job

this source actually gives a lower number

https://www.historians.org/about-aha-and-membership/aha-history-and-archives/gi-roundtable-series/pamphlets/em-13-how-shall-lend-lease-accounts-be-settled-(1945)/how-much-of-what-goods-have-we-sent-to-which-allies

6000

I dont care for tanks I said

Ill settle on the latter

the lend lease wasnt just tanks

http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/HowTo:Be_okay_with_having_a_capitalist_friend

Implying capitalists want to be your friend

okay what do you think was the biggest impact if it wasn't tanks?

planes? guns?
name anything

Everything including tanks

okay let's review these figures

https://ww2-weapons.com/russian-arms-production/

what the russians had was their sacrifise and blood but that didnt win the war alone

However ww2 was won due to the americans

who have created the western front again

and a southern one

all together, there were 17 million tons of goods shipped to the USSR

from 1941-1945

let's just look at soviet production of raw materials here

all together, the USSR produced 263 million tons of coal, ore, steel, and aluminium

Like I said, lend lease and blood alone didnt win the war

which means that the USA shipped the soviets less than 6% of what they produced themselves

the lend-lease act did basically nothing for the soviets

except prepare far more men

and that's not even including soviet production/storage of any machines or vehicles

dont forget the newer technology

that's the US's entire shipments vs soviet raw materials alone

were there any soviet troops armed with thompson machine guns on the front lines?

which greatly helped moscow and stalingrad during winter

any shermans on the eastern front?

No? But many others

Better tanks for sure

the majority of the US's shipped tanks were shermans

4000 out of 7000

So then there was