therefore, the lend-lease act gave the USSR a small amount of inferior tanks
and was therefore not a factor in the eastern front
they werent inferior, no
we just went over this
Yes, "even the medium article agrees that the sherman was mediocre but for some reason says that the T-34 was worse"
the US military report that was cited by a source you used describes them as better
https://www.scribd.com/document/230672358/ENGINEERING-ANALYSIS-OF-THE-RUSSIAN-T34-85-TANK
this document here
describes the sherman as better?
no describes the T-34
even US tank designers agreed that the T-34 was better
that doesnt mean its better
show the rest
I posted the entire thing
there's 459 pages
that was all on page 9 and 10
these are desirable features, not comparisons or anything
Look at the undesirable features too
it clearly says that the armor was similarly thick
and that the hatches are above adequate by US standards
Okay, that doesnt mean it was better though
Don't bother arguing with counterrevolutionaries
Why would I counter your delusions?
They're not real
Irony
Said the pseudo
He's best ignored
My name is a joke
I've said this many times to you
imagine being so delusional that you even disagree with the US army on which tank is the best
When the deluded attempts to cry delusions
Oh I get it now, its because you're a joke
sure
the us military never said it was better
What's with all the spongebob characters
