Message from @DA GOMMIE JOO

Discord ID: 547930942472323082


2019-02-20 23:49:57 UTC  

Its better to be dumb and happy at the moment than smart and depressed

2019-02-20 23:52:19 UTC  
2019-02-20 23:52:49 UTC  

guess you have a point there

2019-02-20 23:53:25 UTC  

didnt read that one it says :rom Western Australian broadacre soils are low and unlikely to warrant investment for emission mitigation alone

2019-02-20 23:55:18 UTC  

but it is just from austrailia which has cattle for the most part and little cultivation of crops

2019-02-20 23:56:27 UTC  

it does explains the issue pretty clearly , so yeah. carbon is bs. it even makes plants grow faster creating more evaporation and thus more cloud cover and temprature migation

2019-02-20 23:58:42 UTC  

*objection*

2019-02-20 23:59:08 UTC  

as you can see here, carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has been increasing at the same rate as nitrous oxide

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308995540782284817/547930235211874315/Major_greenhouse_gas_trends.png

2019-02-20 23:59:42 UTC  

and as you can tell by the vertical axis, there is far more carbon dioxide than nitrous oxide

2019-02-21 00:00:08 UTC  

lol

2019-02-21 00:00:11 UTC  

you fail face

2019-02-21 00:00:19 UTC  

therefore, we would expect to see more global warming caused by carbon dioxide than nitrous oxide

2019-02-21 00:00:33 UTC  

nitrous oxid is 300 time more active as a green hous gas

2019-02-21 00:00:47 UTC  

but there is one thousand times as much carbon dioxide in the atmosphere

2019-02-21 00:01:11 UTC  

the carbon dioxide is measured in parts per *million* whereas the nitrous oxide is measured in parts per *billion*

2019-02-21 00:01:24 UTC  

therefore carbon dioxide has more of an effect

2019-02-21 00:01:27 UTC  

fuck that comma\

2019-02-21 00:01:30 UTC  

because there is far more of it

2019-02-21 00:01:39 UTC  

but still

2019-02-21 00:01:48 UTC  

plants grow faster with more co2

2019-02-21 00:01:56 UTC  

that's assuming they can keep pace

2019-02-21 00:02:23 UTC  

we've often heard that the amazon rainforest is responsible for a third of carbon dioxide intake, right?

2019-02-21 00:02:50 UTC  

well one fifth of the world's generated oxygen goes right back into it

2019-02-21 00:03:52 UTC  

a good chunk of that oxygen never makes it out

2019-02-21 00:04:07 UTC  

the truth is the industrial revolution far outpaced what nature was able to take in a long time ago

2019-02-21 00:04:42 UTC  

~~the industrial revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race~~

2019-02-21 00:05:43 UTC  

but carbon levels and temprature stil dont causate completly

2019-02-21 00:06:04 UTC  

there is no one race, and human is not a biological term

2019-02-21 00:07:31 UTC  

btw is that data set you posted output or airvallues?

2019-02-21 00:08:00 UTC  

because if it is output you have to look at the cycle and how much is absorbed in it

2019-02-21 00:08:55 UTC  

maybe n2o doesnt gets taken up increasing over time

2019-02-21 00:10:19 UTC  

im guessing airvallues

2019-02-21 00:12:56 UTC  

@DA GOMMIE JOO im stil not wrong tho <:caring:312066184948350976> it is 300 times more active and thus worse 😄

2019-02-21 02:52:16 UTC  

Uhhh, any situationists here?

2019-02-21 02:52:19 UTC  

No?

2019-02-21 02:52:23 UTC  

Alright OK

2019-02-21 03:05:00 UTC  

third world is based

2019-02-21 03:05:04 UTC  

first world is cringe

2019-02-21 03:05:09 UTC  

third world is exploited

2019-02-21 03:05:11 UTC  

first world isn’t

2019-02-21 03:05:26 UTC  

that’s the ultimate REDpill