because the politically active ones tend to be more liberal

whats your problem with nbc and all the others

you arent forced to watch them

i dont watch them

once again

im not trying to interject my memes into this

afaik you aren't even forced to pay for them, they're all private

im saying there is a leftist bias in most things

sure it isnt a problem for me

but when 60% of people get their info from that

and the rest get their info from echochambers on facebook or twitter

its a problem

meanwhile I'm forced to pay for my psycho-catholic national tv

>im saying there is a leftist bias in most things
hasn't a thought occured to you that maybe its where the centre lies

hasn't a thought occured to you that maybe if so many people, including very knowledgeable and intelligent individuals(scientists) are for those, then maybe they're simply right?

why do you have to be such a fucking contrarian

what do you plan to do about "liberal bias in media"?

right wingers are always scolding leftists ideas of parity

im not doing anything

again you're trying to mischaracterize my argument

im just stating how it is

also even from a neo-con boomer point my arguments are still true

its not because its center

or because im le contrarian

and from my point of view US media is centre biased if anything

there's almost no representation of the left in the American politics or media

Yeah no

democrats are centre-left at best

it's always funny to me that american free market supporters are crying so much about welfare

while in reality theres little welfare in the US

compared to GDP

it all goes to niggers

it goes to the poorer ones

just as its supposed to be

it's supposed to equalize the opportunities

welfare goes for the poorest, yes

thats the point

>she has none
>all of the witnesses have gone against her
wat
Deborah Ramirez made it pretty clear what was goin on there. Mike Judge denies he was there, but there is another witness Swetnick who claims he and other people were there
>there is literally no proofs
>she has no case
the investigation didn't even begin, it was just a hearing.
https://www.businessinsider.com/fbi-kavanaugh-investigation-restrictions-julie-swatnick-2018-9?IR=T
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/senate-democrats-investigate-a-new-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct-from-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez

also Swetnick put forward her own accusations towards him

```Deborah Ramirez made it pretty clear what was goin on there. Mike Judge denies he was there, but there is another witness Swetnick who claims he and other people were there``` those people aren't witnesses, they are other accusers

and by she doesnt have a case i meant she has no corroboration for any of her statements