Message from @rogalik
Discord ID: 496780088659017730
and the rest get their info from echochambers on facebook or twitter
its a problem
meanwhile I'm forced to pay for my psycho-catholic national tv
>im saying there is a leftist bias in most things
hasn't a thought occured to you that maybe its where the centre lies
hasn't a thought occured to you that maybe if so many people, including very knowledgeable and intelligent individuals(scientists) are for those, then maybe they're simply right?
why do you have to be such a fucking contrarian
what do you plan to do about "liberal bias in media"?
right wingers are always scolding leftists ideas of parity
im not doing anything
again you're trying to mischaracterize my argument
im just stating how it is
also even from a neo-con boomer point my arguments are still true
its not because its center
or because im le contrarian
and from my point of view US media is centre biased if anything
there's almost no representation of the left in the American politics or media
Yeah no
democrats are centre-left at best
it's always funny to me that american free market supporters are crying so much about welfare
while in reality theres little welfare in the US
it all goes to niggers
it goes to the poorer ones
just as its supposed to be
it's supposed to equalize the opportunities
welfare goes for the poorest, yes
thats the point
>she has none
>all of the witnesses have gone against her
wat
Deborah Ramirez made it pretty clear what was goin on there. Mike Judge denies he was there, but there is another witness Swetnick who claims he and other people were there
>there is literally no proofs
>she has no case
the investigation didn't even begin, it was just a hearing.
https://www.businessinsider.com/fbi-kavanaugh-investigation-restrictions-julie-swatnick-2018-9?IR=T
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/senate-democrats-investigate-a-new-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct-from-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez
also Swetnick put forward her own accusations towards him
```Deborah Ramirez made it pretty clear what was goin on there. Mike Judge denies he was there, but there is another witness Swetnick who claims he and other people were there``` those people aren't witnesses, they are other accusers
and by she doesnt have a case i meant she has no corroboration for any of her statements
Mike Judge is
mike judge is and is against ford
swetnick and ramirez are separate incidents
he isn't against ford, he's telling he wasn't even there, which doesn't corroborate with Swetnick
which can make him a witness
>swetnick and ramirez are separate incidents
yes, which doesn't make all of them accusers in those individual cases
judge is a witness
but judge is supporting kavanaugh
>judge is a witness
what <:thonking:318673885497262091>
yes but in this case ramirez and swetnick arent witnesses