Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 416648628333969409
@Роберт Sure, they got some support from the allies, but not much, and it became lighter as time went on.
When they got support it was late 1943
When they were winning the war
Thefore it was useless
Especially if you compare it with what USSR produced
@Роберт Not completely so, but to the point where it hardly mattered.
I can't show you right now USSR production and what they got with Allied support
The USSR produced complete shit, their only advantage was numbers, and attrition.
To show you how it made barely 5% of what USSR produced
And no, you forgot the T-34/85
USSR had tech aswell
Tech that was completely inferior when compared to nazi, and allied tanks.
Did you seriously say that Allies had better tanks than USSR?
That's a good trigger
USSR had numbers that they basically could have fucking world war z zombie walled that shit
Sure, it may have been better when compared to most japanese and italian tanks, but that is besides the point.
I feel like I have had this conversation before.
Do you know why Germans made the Tiger in the first place?
And even then
They had problems with soviet tanks
Did you really just ask that?
@Роберт Yes.
You have many, KV-1, KV-2, T-34, T-34-85, IS-2, etc...
Just compare them
And you will see
Why do you think Allies barely did anything against 10% of the German army
in the west
@Роберт What? According to wikipedia the T32 was an american tank.
Good for you, so was the Calliope but we both know who made it.
@Роберт And according to wikipedia the T-34 was also outclassed by the whermact.
No shit, why do you think T-34/85 was made
Thats like saying that Panzer I was outclassed by the soviets
Retarded logic.
And the IS-2 was made right as the war was coming to an end.
It was still in the WW2
Look at Japan.
Even IS-3
Was made during WW2
@Роберт And, according to wikipedia, the T family of tanks were still incredibly ineffective against the nazi's until the end of the war.
How about you use your brain instead of Wikipedia?