Message from @RobotWizard

Discord ID: 417894070623666186


2018-02-27 03:57:18 UTC  

omg

2018-02-27 03:57:54 UTC  

@fannybandit
>Rome
>Mouscoucy VS Mongolians
>Germany
>Brazil
>Ottoman Empire
>Holy roman Empire
>Aztec empire

2018-02-27 03:58:10 UTC  

Those were not civil wars...just wars.

2018-02-27 03:58:29 UTC  

Also, you're naming empires...not civil wars/revolutions.

2018-02-27 03:59:04 UTC  

@fannybandit Geez, it isn't like these all had similar civil wars or invasions in which their lives were totally changed and their militaries and civilians fought side by side in conflicts.

2018-02-27 03:59:12 UTC  

When the people and the military fight on the same side, government/establishments always lose.

2018-02-27 03:59:12 UTC  

@fannybandit The US civil war saw the establishment divide - then the military

2018-02-27 03:59:40 UTC  

It's about interests, not how they fight.

2018-02-27 04:00:02 UTC  

For the first time in human history, the people and the military have an interest in abolishing the current establishment.

2018-02-27 04:00:11 UTC  

They can do this very easily and lawfully.

2018-02-27 04:00:24 UTC  

really... the first time?!

2018-02-27 04:00:28 UTC  

Yes.

2018-02-27 04:00:40 UTC  

Every other time, the government controlled the military to fight against the people.

2018-02-27 04:00:44 UTC  

@Nicholas91 The US did a study in the past, in which it determined that in the case of a civil war, 30% of the population would IMMEDIEATLY fight, and 90% of the military would abandon post IMMEDIEATLY, and the structure of power within the military and federal government would crumble, as well as that, foreign powers would also jump in and fund their own sides.

2018-02-27 04:00:56 UTC  

In other words, the US would be toast.

2018-02-27 04:01:10 UTC  

The US would be toast if the military divided.

2018-02-27 04:01:16 UTC  

@fannybandit Hey pal, no changing the rules for yourself so you automatically become correct.

2018-02-27 04:01:31 UTC  

@fannybandit You asked for a list, you got one.

2018-02-27 04:01:33 UTC  

Luckily, we have commanders that will ensure that the military would stay united and fight for the people.

2018-02-27 04:01:44 UTC  

@Deleted User thats very interesting. I can't help but want to argue that new power structures would quickly fill the vacuum

2018-02-27 04:01:50 UTC  

The military was the establishment

2018-02-27 04:01:53 UTC  

@Deleted User That was a list of empires and irrelevant information.

2018-02-27 04:02:10 UTC  

@RobotWizard#3986 Key word: "was".

2018-02-27 04:02:18 UTC  

Robert E Lee executed John Brown during Bleeding Kansas

2018-02-27 04:03:00 UTC  

Right now, the military and the establishment are separated...which is the best part.

2018-02-27 04:03:11 UTC  

Are they?

2018-02-27 04:03:13 UTC  

In what way

2018-02-27 04:03:15 UTC  

@fannybandit Wow, you pull the same card again, it isn't like all of those countries were involved in civil conflicts that totally revolutionized their empires and had both the military and citizens involved in war.

2018-02-27 04:03:22 UTC  

the military industrial complex is a pretty big thing

2018-02-27 04:03:28 UTC  

^

2018-02-27 04:03:31 UTC  

That creates the perfect atmosphere in which the people's justice can be served against the establishment with force.

2018-02-27 04:03:43 UTC  

ya dreamin m8

2018-02-27 04:03:48 UTC  

not to mention shit like Cheney being a member of a private security company during the Iraq war

2018-02-27 04:03:48 UTC  

Without the military, it's complex is irrelevant.

2018-02-27 04:04:01 UTC  

Of course

2018-02-27 04:04:02 UTC  

The military would annihilate mercenaries.

2018-02-27 04:04:14 UTC  

The military is what creates the demand

2018-02-27 04:04:21 UTC  

No, government does that.

2018-02-27 04:04:30 UTC  

How do you think 9/11 happened?

2018-02-27 04:04:37 UTC  

That was a demand driver.

2018-02-27 04:04:48 UTC  

The supply followed.